CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 430Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer StudiesStrong Light-Matter Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the adequacy of the Redfield equation and related approaches to the study of quantum dynamics in electronic energy transfer

Ishizaki, Akihito, Fleming, Graham R.·2009·The Journal of Chemical Physics
DOI 10.1063/1.3155214
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The observation of long-lived electronic coherence in photosynthetic excitation energy transfer (EET) by Engel et al. [Nature (London) 446, 782 (2007)] raises questions about the role of the protein environment in protecting this coherence and the significance of the quantum coherence in light harvesting efficiency. In this paper we explore the applicability of the Redfield equation in its full form, in the secular approximation and with neglect of the imaginary part of the relaxation terms for the study of these phenomena. We find that none of the methods can give a reliable picture of the role of the environment in photosynthetic EET. In particular the popular secular approximation (or the corresponding Lindblad equation) produces anomalous behavior in the incoherent transfer region leading to overestimation of the contribution of environment-assisted transfer. The full Redfield expression on the other hand produces environment-independent dynamics in the large reorganization energy region. A companion paper presents an improved approach, which corrects these deficiencies [A. Ishizaki and G. R. Fleming, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 234111 (2009)].

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.3155214

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 2000, Photosynthetic Excitons
  2. Sinanoğlu, 1965, Modern Quantum Chemistry Part III, 93

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–429 of 429

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ishizaki, A., & Fleming, G. R.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
ORCID
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Publisher
AIP Publishing
Published
2009-06-18
Volume
130
Issue
23
Pages
234110-234110
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
DOI
10.1063/1.3155214
OpenAlex
W2009237413
Cited by
430
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 39
FWCI
22.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Chemical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
Keywords
Redfield equation, excitation energy transfer, photosynthetic light harvesting, quantum coherence, secular approximation, Lindblad master equation, reorganization energy, protein environment, quantum dynamics
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Electrons, Energy Transfer, Models, Chemical, Quantum Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review