The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of TD-DFT methods and of various spin scaled CIS(D) and CC2 versions for the treatment of low-lying valence excitations of large organic dyes
Abstract
We present an extension of our previously published benchmark set for low-lying valence transitions of large organic dyes [L. Goerigk et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 4611 (2009)]. The new set comprises in total 12 molecules, including two charged species and one with a clear charge-transfer transition. Our previous study on TD-DFT methods is repeated for the new test set with a larger basis set. Additionally, we want to shed light on different spin-scaled variants of the configuration interaction singles with perturbative doubles correction [CIS(D)] and the approximate coupled cluster singles and doubles method (CC2). Particularly for CIS(D) we want to clarify, which of the proposed versions can be recommended. Our results indicate that an unpublished SCS-CIS(D) variant, which is implemented into the TURBOMOLE program package, shows worse results than the original CIS(D) method, while other modified versions perform better. An SCS-CIS(D) version with a parameterization, that has already been used in an application by us recently [L. Goerigk and S. Grimme, ChemPhysChem 9, 2467 (2008)], yields the best results. Another SCS-CIS(D) version and the SOS-CIS(D) method [Y. M. Rhee and M. Head-Gordon, J. Phys. Chem. A 111, 5314 (2007)] perform very similar, though. For the electronic transitions considered herein, there is no improvement observed when going from the original CC2 to the SCS-CC2 method but further adjustment of the latter seems to be beneficial. Double-hybrid density functionals belong to best methods tested here. Particularly B2GP-PLYP provides uniformly good results for the complete set and is considered to be close to chemical accuracy within an ab initio theory of color. For conventional hybrid functionals, a Fock-exchange mixing parameter of about 0.4 seems to be optimum in TD-DFT treatments of large chromophores. A range-separated functional such as, e.g., CAM-B3LYP seems also to be promising.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S., & Krieg, H. (2010) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3382344 · Cited by 59,686
Self-citationDensity-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior
Becke, A. D. (1988) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.38.3098 · Cited by 53,711
Weigend, F., & Ahlrichs, R. (2005) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b508541a · Cited by 30,598
Stephens, P. J., Devlin, F. J., Chabalowski, C. F., & Frisch, M. J. (1994) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100096a001 · Cited by 23,248
Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model
Adamo, C., & Barone, V. (1999) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.478522 · Cited by 19,042
Hehre, W. J., Ditchfield, R., & Pople, J. A. (1972) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1677527 · Cited by 15,855
A new hybrid exchange–correlation functional using the Coulomb-attenuating method (CAM-B3LYP)
Yanai, T., Tew, D. P., & Handy, N. C. (2004) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2004.06.011 · Cited by 14,976
Cited by
Laurent, A. D., & Jacquemin, D. (2013) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.24438 · Cited by 1,382
Dye chemistry with time-dependent density functional theory
Laurent, A. D., Adamo, C., & Jacquemin, D. (2014) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c3cp55336a · Cited by 398
Najibi, A., & Goerigk, L. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00842 · Cited by 320
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Goerigk, L., & Grimme, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2010-05-11
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 18
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2067812649
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 16.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of TD-DFT methods and of various spin scaled CIS(D) and CC2 versions for the treatment of low-lying valence excitations of large organic dyes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.3418614
- The paper
- Goerigk, L., & Grimme, S. (2010). Assessment of TD-DFT methods and of various spin scaled CIS(D) and CC2 versions for the treatment of low-lying valence excitations of large organic dyes. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3418614
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.