The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theory of electronic relaxation in solution in the absence of an activation barrier
Abstract
We present a theory which describes the effects of viscosity on those electronic relaxation processes in solution in which the intramolecular potential surface does not present a barrier to the motion leading to the decay of the initially formed excited state. We model the reactive motion as the motion of a solute particle on the excited state potential surface with a position dependent sink which gives rise to the decay of the excited state population. Three different types of sinks are considered: (A) a pinhole sink at the minimum of the potential surface; this models the situation when the molecule decays to ground state as soon as it reaches the potential minimum; (B) a Gaussian sink with probability of decay maximum at the potential minimum; (C) a Lorentzian sink with maximum decay at the potential minimum. For case (A) an explicit analytic solution is obtained for the decay rate, but for cases (B) and (C) we obtained the decay rate numerically. Model (A) predicts nonexponential decay at all viscosities except at long times when the decay is single exponential. For cases (B) and (C) the decay is single exponential at low viscosities but becomes multiexponential at high viscosities. We show that the experimentally observed fractional viscosity dependence of fluorescence quantum yield arises naturally in this theory due to the position dependence of the sink as well as due to the competition between radiative and nonradiative relaxation. Our model also predicts a crossover from an apparent negative (constant viscosity) activation energy at low viscosities to a positive activation energy at high viscosity. The physical significance of these results is discussed in light of the available experimental results on TPM dye relaxation. Some possible generalizations of our theory to more realistic cases are indicated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Mathematical Functions
McQuarrie, D. A. (1966) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1972842 · Cited by 40,433
Cited by
Grabowski, Z. R., Rotkiewicz, K., & Rettig, W. (2003) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr940745l · Cited by 3,714
Molecular Rotors: What Lies Behind the High Sensitivity of the Thioflavin-T Fluorescent Marker
Amdursky, N., Erez, Y., & Huppert, D. (2012) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar300053p · Cited by 411
Sparpaglione, M., & Mukamel, S. (1988) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.453922 · Cited by 278
Dynamical effects in electron transfer reactions. II. Numerical solution
Nadler, W., & Marcus, R. A. (1987) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.451951 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Bagchi, B., Fleming, G. R., & Oxtoby, D. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1983-06-15
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7375-7385
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1965416424
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theory of electronic relaxation in solution in the absence of an activation barrier. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.444729
- The paper
- Bagchi, B., Fleming, G. R., & Oxtoby, D. W. (1983). Theory of electronic relaxation in solution in the absence of an activation barrier. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.444729
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.