Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 728

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Liquid to solidlike transitions of molecularly thin films under shear

Gee, Michelle L., McGuiggan, Patricia M., Israelachvili, Jacob N., Homola, Andrew M.·1990·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

We have measured the shear forces between two molecularly smooth solid surfaces separated by thin films of various organic liquids. The aim was to investigate the nature of the transitions from continuum to molecular behavior in very thin films. For films whose thickness exceeds ten molecular diameters both their static and dynamic behavior can usually be described in terms of their bulk properties, but for thinner films their behavior becomes progressively more solidlike and can no longer be described, even qualitatively, in terms of bulk/continuum properties such as viscosity. The solidlike state is characterized by the ordering of the liquid molecules into discrete layers. The molecular ordering is further modified by shear, which imposes a preferred orientation. All solidlike films exhibit a yield point or critical shear stress, beyond which they behave like liquid crystals or ductile solids undergoing plastic deformation. Our results on five liquids of different molecular geometry reveal some very complex thin-film properties, such as the quantization of various static and dynamic properties, discontinuous or continuous solid–liquid transitions, smooth or stick–slip friction, and two-dimensional nucleation. Quantitatively, the ‘‘effective’’ viscosity in molecularly thin films can be 105 times the bulk value, and molecular relaxation times can be 1010 times slower. These properties depend not only on the nature of the liquid, but also on the atomic structure of the surfaces, the normal pressure, and the direction and velocity of sliding. We also conclude that many thin-film properties depend on there being two surfaces close together and that they cannot be understood from a consideration of a single solid–liquid interface. The results provide new fundamental insights into the states of thin films, and have a bearing on understanding boundary friction, thin-film lubrication and the stress–strain properties of solids at the molecular level.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.459067

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 728

Metadata

Authors
Gee, M. L., McGuiggan, P. M., Israelachvili, J. N., & Homola, A. M.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1990-08-01
Volume
93
Issue
3
Pages
1895-1906
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2005432201
Cited by
728
References
31
FWCI
18.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liquid to solidlike transitions of molecularly thin films under shear. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.459067
The paper
Gee, M. L., McGuiggan, P. M., Israelachvili, J. N., & Homola, A. M. (1990). Liquid to solidlike transitions of molecularly thin films under shear. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.459067

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.