The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Noise reduction in functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals by independent component analysis
Abstract
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is used to detect concentration changes of oxy-hemoglobin and deoxy-hemoglobin in the human brain. The main difficulty entailed in the analysis of fNIRS signals is the fact that the hemodynamic response to a specific neuronal activation is contaminated by physiological and instrument noises, motion artifacts, and other interferences. This paper proposes independent component analysis (ICA) as a means of identifying the original hemodynamic response in the presence of noises. The original hemodynamic response was reconstructed using the primary independent component (IC) and other, less-weighting-coefficient ICs. In order to generate experimental brain stimuli, arithmetic tasks were administered to eight volunteer subjects. The t-value of the reconstructed hemodynamic response was improved by using the ICs found in the measured data. The best t-value out of 16 low-pass-filtered signals was 37, and that of the reconstructed one was 51. Also, the average t-value of the eight subjects’ reconstructed signals was 40, whereas that of all of their low-pass-filtered signals was only 20. Overall, the results showed the applicability of the ICA-based method to noise-contamination reduction in brain mapping.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Fox, M. D., & Raichle, M. E. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2201 · Cited by 6,700
Cited by
fNIRS-based brain-computer interfaces: a review
Naseer, N., & Hong, K.-S. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00003 · Cited by 988
Self-citationHerold, F., Wiegel, P., Scholkmann, F., & Müller, N. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm7120466 · Cited by 482
Naseer, N., & Hong, K.-S. (2013) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2013.08.021 · Cited by 301
Self-citationFeature Extraction and Classification Methods for Hybrid fNIRS-EEG Brain-Computer Interfaces
Hong, K.-S., Khan, M. J., & Hong, M. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00246 · Cited by 283
Self-citationDecoding of four movement directions using hybrid NIRS-EEG brain-computer interface
Khan, M. J., Hong, M. J., & Hong, K.-S. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00244 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Santosa, H., Jiyoun Hong, M., Kim, S.-P., & Hong, K.-S.
- Venue
- Review of Scientific Instruments
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2013-07-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 073106-073106
- ISSN
- 0034-6748 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7623
- OpenAlex
- W2078580188
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noise reduction in functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals by independent component analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.4812785
- The paper
- Santosa, H., Jiyoun Hong, M., Kim, S.-P., & Hong, K.-S. (2013). Noise reduction in functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals by independent component analysis. Review of Scientific Instruments. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812785
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.