Cited by 64Quantum Information and CryptographyCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Ion traps fabricated in a CMOS foundry

Open access
Mehta, K. K., Eltony, A. M., Bruzewicz, C. D., Chuang, I. L., Ram, R. J., Sage, J. M., Chiaverini, J.·2014·Applied Physics Letters

Abstract

We demonstrate trapping in a surface-electrode ion trap fabricated in a 90-nm CMOS (complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor) foundry process utilizing the top metal layer of the process for the trap electrodes. The process includes doped active regions and metal interconnect layers, allowing for co-fabrication of standard CMOS circuitry as well as devices for optical control and measurement. With one of the interconnect layers defining a ground plane between the trap electrode layer and the p-type doped silicon substrate, ion loading is robust and trapping is stable. We measure a motional heating rate comparable to those seen in surface-electrode traps of similar size. This demonstration of scalable quantum computing hardware utilizing a commercial CMOS process opens the door to integration and co-fabrication of electronics and photonics for large-scale quantum processing in trapped-ion arrays.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.4892061

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of advanced standard fabrication methods such as CMOS is facilitated, compared with rf traps, by the lack of high-voltage rf signals.

    “The use of advanced standard fabrication methods such as CMOS56,57 is facilitated, compared with rf traps, by the lack of high-voltage rf signals.”

    From Penning micro-trap for quantum computing (2024) · cites this paper as [56]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehta, K. K., Eltony, A. M., Bruzewicz, C. D., Chuang, I. L., Ram, R. J., Sage, J. M., & Chiaverini, J.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • MIT-Harvard Center for Ultracold Atoms (US)
  • MIT Lincoln Laboratory (US)
Venue
Applied Physics Letters
Published
2014-07-28
Volume
105
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0003-6951 (ISSN-L)
  • 1077-3118
OpenAlex
W2002255493
Cited by
64
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Physics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (NSF)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
surface-electrode ion trap, CMOS foundry fabrication, trapped-ion quantum computing, ion trapping, motional heating, ion loading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review