Cited by 36Particle accelerators and beam dynamicsPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsMagnetic confinement fusion research

Appropriate use of the particle-in-cell method in low temperature plasmas: Application to the simulation of negative ion extraction

Open access
Garrigues, L., Fubiani, G., Boeuf, J. P.·2016·Journal of Applied Physics

Abstract

The Particle-In-Cell Monte Carlo Collision (PIC MCC) method has been used by different authors in the last ten years to describe negative ion extraction in the context of neutral beam injection for fusion. Questionable results on the intensity and profile of the extracted negative ion beamlets have been presented in several recently published papers. Using a standard explicit PIC MCC method, we show that these results are due to a non-compliance with the constraints of the numerical method (grid spacing, number of particles per cell) and to a non-physical generation of the simulated plasma. We discuss in detail the conditions of mesh convergence and plasma generation and show that the results can significantly deviate from the correct solution and lead to unphysical features when the constraints inherent to the method are not strictly fulfilled. This paper illustrates the importance of verification in any plasma simulation. Since the results presented in this paper have been obtained with careful verification of the method, we propose them as benchmarks for future comparisons between different simulation codes for negative ion extraction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.4971265

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pseudo-2D PIC scheme was shown to capture the multidimensional plasma phenomena in all 2D configurations relevant to a Hall thruster, i.e., axial-azimuthal, azimuthal-radial, and axial-radial, with relatively few regions used, showing a computational speed-up with respect to the 2D simulation up to 50.

    “The pseudo-2D PIC scheme was shown to capture the multidimensional plasma phenomena in all 2D configurations relevant to a HT, i.e., axial-azimuthal, azimuthal-radial, and axialradial 332,333,335-337 with relatively few regions used, showing a computational speed-up with respect to the 2D simulation up to 50.”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [333]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garrigues, L., Fubiani, G., & Boeuf, J. P.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Université de Toulouse LAPLACE, , CNRS, INPT, UPS, Toulouse, France
Venue
Journal of Applied Physics
Published
2016-12-07
Volume
120
Issue
21
Pages
213303
ISSN
  • 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7550
OpenAlex
W2560033345
Cited by
36
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physics (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Horizon 2020 (633053)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Magnetic confinement fusion research
Keywords
negative ion extraction, particle-in-cell Monte Carlo collision, non-thermal plasma, neutral beam injection, fusion plasma, mesh independence, numerical verification, simulation benchmarking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review