The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extension of the D3 dispersion coefficient model
Abstract
A new model, termed D4, for the efficient computation of molecular dipole-dipole dispersion coefficients is presented. As in the related, well established D3 scheme, these are obtained as a sum of atom-in-molecule dispersion coefficients over atom pairs. Both models make use of dynamic polarizabilities obtained from first-principles time-dependent density functional theory calculations for atoms in different chemical environments employing fractional atomic coordination numbers for interpolation. Different from the D3 model, the coefficients are obtained on-the-fly by numerical Casimir-Polder integration of the dynamic, atomic polarizabilities α(iω). Most importantly, electronic density information is now incorporated via atomic partial charges computed at a semi-empirical quantum mechanical tight-binding level, which is used to scale the polarizabilities. Extended statistical measures show that errors for dispersion coefficients with the proposed D4 method are significantly lower than with D3 and other, computationally more involved schemes. Alongside, accurate isotropic charge and hybridization dependent, atom-in-molecule static polarizabilities are obtained with an unprecedented efficiency. Damping function parameters are provided for three standard density functionals, i.e., TPSS, PBE0, and B3LYP, allowing evaluation of the new DFT-D4 model for common non-covalent interaction energy benchmark sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S., & Krieg, H. (2010) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3382344 · Cited by 59,686
Self-citationEffect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory
Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S., & Goerigk, L. (2011) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21759 · Cited by 28,221
Self-citationStephens, P. J., Devlin, F. J., Chabalowski, C. F., & Frisch, M. J. (1994) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100096a001 · Cited by 23,248
Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model
Adamo, C., & Barone, V. (1999) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.478522 · Cited by 19,042
Accurate Coulomb-fitting basis sets for H to Rn
Weigend, F. (2006) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b515623h · Cited by 8,994
Electronic structure calculations on workstation computers: The program system turbomole
Ahlrichs, R., Bär, M., Häser, M., Horn, H., & Kölmel, C. (1989) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/0009-2614(89)85118-8 · Cited by 8,433
Tao, J., Perdew, J. P., Staroverov, V. N., & Scuseria, G. E. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.146401 · Cited by 7,093
Tkatchenko, A., & Scheffler, M. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.073005 · Cited by 6,286
Van der Waals Density Functional for General Geometries
Dion, M., Rydberg, H., Schröder, E., Langreth, D. C., & Lundqvist, B. I. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.246401 · Cited by 5,622
Cited by
Software update: The ORCA program system—Version 5.0
Neese, F. (2022) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1606 · Cited by 4,963
Bannwarth, C., Ehlert, S., & Grimme, S. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01176 · Cited by 4,399
Self-citationNear-unity NIR phosphorescent quantum yield from a room-temperature solvated metal nanocluster
Shi, W.-Q., Zeng, L., He, R.-L., Han, X.-S., Guan, Z.-J., Zhou, M., & Wang, Q.-M. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adk6628 · Cited by 398
Najibi, A., & Goerigk, L. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00842 · Cited by 320
Enantioselective electrochemical cobalt-catalyzed aryl C–H activation reactions
von Münchow, T., Dana, S., Xu, Y., Yuan, B., & Ackermann, L. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg2866 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Caldeweyher, E., Bannwarth, C., & Grimme, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2017-07-21
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 034112-034112
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2737449748
- Cited by
- 1,439
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 20.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extension of the D3 dispersion coefficient model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.4993215
- The paper
- Caldeweyher, E., Bannwarth, C., & Grimme, S. (2017). Extension of the D3 dispersion coefficient model. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4993215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
