The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Peer Instruction: A User's Manual
Abstract
I. OVERVIEW. 1. Introduction. 2. Peer Instruction. 3. Motivating the Students. 4. A Step-by-Step Guide to Preparing for a Peer Instruction Lecture. 5. Sample Lecture. 6. Epilogue. II. RESOURCES. 7. Mechanics Baseline Test. 8. Force Concept Inventory. 9. Questionnaire Results. 10. Reading Quizzes. 11. Concept Tests. 12. Conceptual Exam Questions. Appendix: Disk Instructions. Index.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions
Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165919 · Cited by 956
Henderson, C., Dancy, M., & Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M. (2012) · Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevstper.8.020104 · Cited by 322
Increased Course Structure Improves Performance in Introductory Biology
Freeman, S., Haak, D., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2011) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.10-08-0105 · Cited by 306
Why does peer instruction benefit student learning?
Tullis, J. G., & Goldstone, R. L. (2020) · Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-020-00218-5 · Cited by 153
DebBurman, S. K. (2002) · Cell Biology Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.02-07-0024 · Cited by 117
The Problem of Revealing How Students Think: Concept Inventories and Beyond
Smith, J. I., & Tanner, K. (2010) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.09-12-0094 · Cited by 106
Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
Thornton, R. K., Kuhl, D., Cummings, K., & Marx, J. (2009) · Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevstper.5.010105 · Cited by 103
Penuel, W. R., Boscardin, C. K., Masyn, K., & Crawford, V. M. (2007) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9023-4 · Cited by 97
IN PURSUIT OF MEANINGFUL LEARNING
Michael, J. (2001) · Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advances.2001.25.3.145 · Cited by 85
Improving Student Engagement With Project-Based Learning: A Case Study in Software Engineering
Morais, P., Ferreira, M. J., & Veloso, B. (2021) · IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje · doi:10.1109/rita.2021.3052677 · Cited by 79
Examinations That Support Collaborative Learning: The Students' Perspective
Rieger, G. W., & Heiner, C. E. (2014) · Journal of College Science Teaching · doi:10.2505/4/jcst14_043_04_41 · Cited by 62
Faculty online learning communities: A model for sustained teaching transformation
Dancy, M., Lau, A. C., Rundquist, A., & Henderson, C. (2019) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.15.020147 · Cited by 53
Thompson, K. V., Chmielewski, J., Gaines, M. S., Hrycyna, C. A., & LaCourse, W. R. (2013) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.12-09-0143 · Cited by 51
Kinnear, G. (2021) · International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s40753-020-00121-w · Cited by 16
Motivation increase of mathematics students in Engineering – A proposal from Game Based Learning
Zabala-Vargas, S. A., García-Mora, L. H., Ardila-Segovia, D. A., & de Benito-Crosetti, B. L. (2019) · 2019 International Symposium on Engineering Accreditation and Education (ICACIT) · doi:10.1109/icacit46824.2019.9130297 · Cited by 13
Applying UDL to Online Active Learning
Rogers, S., & Gronseth, S. (2021) · The Journal of Applied Instructional Design · doi:10.59668/223.3748 · Cited by 4
“Educational reform efforts promoting active learning include Dewey’s (1938) experiential learning, Johnson and Johnson’s (1999) cooperative learning, and inverted learning commonly known as a flipped classroom (Lage et al., 2000; Mazur, 1997).”
BackgroundFrom Obstacle to Catalyst: A Narrative Review of Learning from Errors in Science Education
Fabre-Mitjans, N., Jiménez-Valverde, G., Viciana, S., & Crespo i Torres, F. (2026) · Encyclopedia · doi:10.3390/encyclopedia6090192 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazur, E., & Hilborn, R. C.
- Venue
- Physics Today
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1997-04-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 68-69
- ISSN
- 0031-9228 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-0699
- OpenAlex
- W3003686208
- Cited by
- 1,261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 68.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.