Cited by 10Online and Blended LearningInnovative Teaching MethodsDisability Education and Employment

Applying UDL to Online Active Learning

Open access
Rogers, Sandra, Gronseth, Susie·2021·The Journal of Applied Instructional Design

Abstract

In online environments, active learning techniques can facilitate varied ways that learners engage and enact skill development, understandings, and connections across concepts. The Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework supports providing options and design flexibility. Using a multi-site, mixed method case study design, this exploratory study investigated how 23 instructional designers at three large, urban, US public higher education institutions view alignment between UDL and active learning approaches in online course design. Techniques, strategies, tools, enablers, and challenges of these practices are highlighted. Study data collected included survey responses and focus group sessions. Emergent themes of belongingness, social learning space, structuredness, and universality are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.59668/223.3748

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Online learning in higher education provides unprecedented educational access for diverse students, including those with disabilities.

    “Online learning in higher education provides unprecedented educational access for diverse students, including those with disabilities (Rogers & Gronseth, 2021).”

    From Instructional Designers’ Perceptions of Accessible and Inclusive Online Course Design (2024) · cites this paper as Rogers & Gronseth, 2021

    The Introduction says online learning’s flexibility can increase educational access for diverse student needs and that inclusive course design supports learners with disabilities. It does not describe that access as unprecedented or say that online learning provides it without the qualifying role of flexible design. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is a gap in the literature about instructional designers' experiences, the impact of COVID-19, and their knowledge and responsibilities related to inclusive online course design.

    “There is a gap in the literature about instructional designers' experiences, the impact of COVID-19, and their knowledge and responsibilities related to inclusive online course design (Rogers & Gronseth, 2021).”

    From Instructional Designers’ Perceptions of Accessible and Inclusive Online Course Design (2024) · cites this paper as Rogers & Gronseth, 2021

    The Enablers and Barriers section calls for more investigation of how instructional designers collaborate with instructors to provide accessible online education. Study Limitations also identifies a narrower gap concerning success cases for barriers found during the COVID-19 context. Neither section establishes the broader claimed literature gap covering designers’ experiences, COVID-19’s impact, and their knowledge and responsibilities. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Accessibility is central to inclusive design frameworks such as Universal Design for Learning (UDL).

    “Previous research also suggested that accessibility is central to inclusive design frameworks such as Universal Design for Learning (UDL) (Rogers & Gronseth, 2021).”

    From Instructional Designers’ Perceptions of Accessible and Inclusive Online Course Design (2024) · cites this paper as Rogers & Gronseth, 2021

  • Faculty development aimed at increasing faculty awareness and shifting their mindset toward the social model of disability can lead to a willingness to improve the accessibility and inclusivity of their course designs.

    “Research suggests that faculty development aimed at increasing faculty awareness and shifting their mindset toward the social model of disability can lead to a willingness to improve the accessibility and inclusivity of their course designs (Ginsberg & Schulte, 2008; Izzo et al., 2008; Rogers & Gronseth, 2021).”

    From Instructional Designers’ Perceptions of Accessible and Inclusive Online Course Design (2024) · cites this paper as Rogers & Gronseth, 2021

    The Findings (page unavailable) say instructional designers learned about accessible practices through workshops and other means, and the Enablers and Barriers section mentions training as a possible response to barriers. Neither section reports that faculty development shifts faculty toward the social model of disability or increases their willingness to redesign courses. Searches for those concepts found no passage addressing that proposed effect. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

33 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.), Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain.
  2. Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Norby, M. M. (2011). Cognitive psychology and instruction (5th ed.). Pearson.
  3. Debruler, K., Denton, C., Mckay, A., & Sicilia, E. (2020). Supporting Michigan educators through the transition to online learning. In R. E. Ferdig, E. Baumgartner, R. Hartshorne, R. Kaplan-Rakowski, & C. Mouza (Eds.), Teaching, Technology, and Teacher Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Stories from the Field (pp. 179-185). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/216903/
  4. Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press.
  5. Gronseth, S. (2018). Inclusive design for online and blended courses: Connecting web content accessibility guidelines and Universal Design for Learning. Educational Renaissance, 7, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.33499/edren.v7i1.114 · DOI
  6. Gronseth, S. L., Fu, J., Hebert, W., Zhang, H., Ugwu, L., & Nguyen, P. (2020). Connecting learners through technology in COVID-19: Facilitating pre-service teacher collaboration during the pandemic. In R. E. Ferdig, E. Baumgartner, R. Hartshorne, R. Kaplan-Rakowski, & C. Mouza (Eds.), Teaching, Technology, and Teacher Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Stories from the Field (pp. 179-185). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/216903/
  7. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1999a). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
  8. Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
  9. Kumar, S. & Ritzhaupt, A. (2017). What do instructional designers in higher education really do? International Journal on E-Learning, 16(4), 371-393. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/150980/
  10. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus-or-minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0043158 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Quality Matters™ Higher Education Rubric, sixth edition. (2018). Maryland Online, Inc. https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/PDFs/StandardsfromtheQMHigherEducationRubric.pdf
  12. Roman, T. (2020). Supporting the mental health of preservice teachers in COVID-19 through trauma-informed educational practices and adaptive formative assessment tools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 473-481. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216363/.
  13. Rudestam, K. E., & Schoenholtz-Read, J. (2010). The flourishing of adult online education: An overview. In K. E. Rudestam & J. Schoenholtz-Read (Eds.), Handbook of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 1-28). Sage.
  14. Tanner K. D. (2013). Structure matters: twenty-one teaching strategies to promote student engagement and cultivate classroom equity. CBE life sciences education, 12(3), 322-331. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-06-0115 · DOI
  15. Willmore, J. (2004). Performance basics. ASTD Press. 1. What is your gender? 1. Female 2. Male 3. Non-binary 4. Prefer not to disclose

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogers, S., & Gronseth, S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Houston (US)
Venue
The Journal of Applied Instructional Design
Publisher
EdTech Books
Published
2021
OpenAlex
W3158265706
Cited by
4
References
62
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
Keywords
Universal Design for Learning, active learning, online course design, instructional design, instructional designers, higher education, sense of belonging, social learning spaces, universality, accessibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review