Cited by 33Magnetic confinement fusion researchPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsFusion and Plasma Physics Studies

A comparison between kinetic theory and particle-in-cell simulations of anomalous electron transport in E × B plasma discharges

Open access
Charoy, T., Lafleur, T., Tavant, A., Chabert, P., Bourdon, A.·2020·Physics of Plasmas

Abstract

Understanding anomalous electron transport in E×B discharges remains a key challenge in the development of self-consistent models of these systems. It has been shown that short-wavelength, high-frequency instabilities in the azimuthal E×B direction may be responsible for increased electron transport due to an enhanced electron-ion friction force. Although a theoretical model based on quasi-linear kinetic theory has previously been proposed to describe this friction force, it has so far only undergone limited validation testing. Here, we rigorously assess this theoretical model by comparison with the friction force self-consistently obtained from 2D axial-azimuthal particle-in-cell simulations. The simulation geometry is based on a recently established benchmark configuration for E×B discharges, and a broad parametric study is performed by varying the magnetic field strength, the discharge current density, and the presence of different neutral collisional processes. Overall, the theory is found to be in very good agreement with the simulation results for all cases studied, verifying the underlying physical mechanisms leading to enhanced electron transport. We demonstrate, however, that the friction force depends sensitively on the shape of the electron velocity distribution function, thus posing significant challenges to fully self-consistent, first principles modeling of anomalous transport in fluid simulations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/5.0003978

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In general situations with large time-modulated electric fields, dropping the potential part of the displacement current and solving for E_ES and E_EM separately is not justified because they are coupled.

    “In a general situation, where large time-modulated electric fields can arise due to space charge effects (such as in the plasma sheaths of a capacitively-coupled plasma CCP discharge 119 or in the plasma bulk of a helicon discharge for the m = 0 mode 120 ), dropping the potential part of the displacement current (see Eq. (11)) and solving for E ES and E EM separately is not justified, because they”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [120]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Charoy, T., Lafleur, T., Tavant, A., Chabert, P., & Bourdon, A.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • PlasmaPotential-Physics Consulting and Research 2 , Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
Corresponding author
Charoy, T.
Venue
Physics of Plasmas
Published
2020-06-01
Volume
27
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1070-664X (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7674
OpenAlex
W3033464370
Cited by
33
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Physics of Plasmas (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Safran Aircraft Engines (POSEIDON)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-16-CHIN-0003-01)
  • CINES (A0040510092)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Magnetic confinement fusion research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Fusion and Plasma Physics Studies
Keywords
anomalous electron transport, azimuthal instability, electron velocity distribution, particle-in-cell simulation, magnetic confinement fusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review