Cited by 12Chaos control and synchronizationMathematical Dynamics and FractalsNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation

Delay-induced uncertainty for a paradigmatic glucose–insulin model

Open access
Karamched, Bhargav, Hripcsak, George, Albers, David, Ott, William·2021·Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science

Abstract

Medical practice in the intensive care unit is based on the assumption that physiological systems such as the human glucose–insulin system are predictable. We demonstrate that delay within the glucose–insulin system can induce sustained temporal chaos, rendering the system unpredictable. Specifically, we exhibit such chaos for the ultradian glucose–insulin model. This well-validated, finite-dimensional model represents feedback delay as a three-stage filter. Using the theory of rank one maps from smooth dynamical systems, we precisely explain the nature of the resulting delay-induced uncertainty (DIU). We develop a framework one may use to diagnose DIU in a general oscillatory dynamical system. For infinite-dimensional delay systems, no analog of the theory of rank one maps exists. Nevertheless, we show that the geometric principles encoded in our DIU framework apply to such systems by exhibiting sustained temporal chaos for a linear shear flow. Our results are potentially broadly applicable because delay is ubiquitous throughout mathematical physiology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/5.0027682

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Time delays may induce uncertainty and make machine learning challenging to capture chaotic phenomena.

    “Time delays, which are common in modeling the metabolic system (82–85), may induce uncertainty and make machine learning challenging to capture chaotic phenomena (86, 87).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karamched, B., Hripcsak, G., Albers, D., & Ott, W.
Affiliations
  • Florida State University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • University of Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Ott, William
Venue
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
Published
2021-02-01
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
023142-023142
ISSN
  • 1054-1500 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7682
OpenAlex
W3113053863
Cited by
12
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DMS 1816315)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 LM006910, R01 LM012734, R01 GM117138)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Chaos control and synchronization
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Keywords
glucose-insulin model, feedback delay, temporal chaos, linear shear flow, predictability, intensive care
MeSH terms
Feedback, Glucose, Humans, Insulin, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review