Cited by 6Plasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsGas Dynamics and Kinetic TheoryDust and Plasma Wave Phenomena

Particle distribution functions at plasma–surface interface

Open access
Costin, C.·2020·AIP Advances

Abstract

Particle simulations of bounded plasmas require assumptions on the distribution function of the incoming particles at the plasma–surface interface. Two independent distributions are usually defined, one angular and one energy dependent, disregarding the unified distribution as a whole. In this paper, two types of angular distribution (isotropic and cosine-type) and three types of energy distribution (energy dependent, uniform, and mono-energetic) are compared in a correlated manner via the resulting velocity distribution functions. Examples of incorrectly defined angular distributions are included. Numerical algorithms are indicated for the generation of the discussed distributions. Calculations of the incoming average velocity of the particles, directed perpendicularly to the surface, show the effect of each distribution on subsequent calculations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/5.0030781

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The second approach to electron boundary conditions (selectively reflecting electrons) is capable of reducing downstream boundary effects by reflecting a fraction of outer boundary-crossing electrons, based on their mechanical energy or on the global net current exiting the domain in the last PIC steps.

    “The second approach, on the other hand, is capable of reducing downstream boundary effects by reflecting a fraction of outer boundary-crossing electrons, based on their mechanical energy 248 , or on the global net current exiting the domain in the last PIC steps 247 .”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [248]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. J. E. Gentle, Random Number Generation and Monte Carlo Methods (Springer- Verlag, NY, 1998).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costin, C.
Affiliations
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University (RO)
Corresponding author
Costin, C.
Venue
AIP Advances
Published
2020-11-01
Volume
10
Issue
11
ISSN
2158-3226 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094942119
Cited by
5
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIP Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministry of Education and Research, Romania (1EU-1/2/2016-2022)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena
Keywords
particle distribution function, angular distributions, energy distribution, velocity distribution function, isotropic distribution, bounded plasma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review