Building intuition for binding free energy calculations: Bound state definition, restraints, and symmetry
Open accessAbstract
The theory behind computation of absolute binding free energies using explicit-solvent molecular simulations is well-established, yet somewhat complex, with counter-intuitive aspects. This leads to frequent frustration, common misconceptions, and sometimes erroneous numerical treatment. To improve this, we present the main practically relevant segments of the theory with constant reference to physical intuition. We pinpoint the role of the implicit or explicit definition of the bound state (or the binding site) to make a robust link between an experimental measurement and a computational result. We clarify the role of symmetry and discuss cases where symmetry number corrections have been misinterpreted. In particular, we argue that symmetry corrections as classically presented are a source of confusion and could be advantageously replaced by restraint free energy contributions. We establish that contrary to a common intuition, partial or missing sampling of some modes of symmetric bound states does not affect the calculated decoupling free energies. Finally, we review these questions and pitfalls in the context of a few common practical situations: binding to a symmetric receptor (equivalent binding sites), binding of a symmetric ligand (equivalent poses), and formation of a symmetric complex, in the case of homodimerization.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While the path-based PMF approach appears more tractable, it is still difficult to obtain converged free energy estimates for large biomolecules with complex geometries.
“While the path-based PMF approach appears more tractable, it is still difficult to obtain converged free energy estimates for large biomolecules with complex geometries.53,62−68”
From Assessment of the Topology and Oligomerisation States of Coiled Coils Using Metadynamics with Conformational Restraints (2025) · cites this paper as [63]
More precise free energy changes can be obtained through the application of restraints which ensure that the relative orientation and position of the ligand with respect to the receptor is preserved and therefore the available phase space to be sampled during the simulations is reduced.
“More precise free energy changes can be obtained through the application of restraints which ensure that the relative orientation and position of the ligand with respect to the receptor is preserved and therefore the available phase space to be sampled during the simulations is reduced.54,63−65”
From Assessment of the Topology and Oligomerisation States of Coiled Coils Using Metadynamics with Conformational Restraints (2025) · cites this paper as [63]
Since the coiled coils in the present study are all homomultimers composed of identical α-helical monomers, the effect of symmetry must be considered during the calculation of the binding free energy, and a symmetry correction must be applied.
“Since the coiled coils in the present study are all homomultimers composed of identical α-helical monomers, the effect of symmetry must also be considered during the calculation of the binding free energy.63,69 Therefore, a symmetry correction must be applied to the binding free energy as follows”
From Assessment of the Topology and Oligomerisation States of Coiled Coils Using Metadynamics with Conformational Restraints (2025) · cites this paper as [63]
Cites
VMD: visual molecular dynamics
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., & Schulten, K. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Graphics · doi:10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · Cited by 66,952 · see citing works
GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free
van der Spoel, D., Lindahl, E. R., Hess, B., Groenhof, G., Mark, A. E., & Berendsen, H. J. C. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20291 · Cited by 19,187 · see citing works
The missing term in effective pair potentials
Berendsen, H. J. C., Grigera, J. R., & Straatsma, T. P. (1987) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100308a038 · Cited by 13,313 · see citing works
The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities
Genheden, S., & Ryde, U. (2015) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936 · Cited by 5,636 · see citing works
Kollman, P. A., Massova, I., Reyes, C., Kuhn, B., Huo, S., Chong, L., Lee, M., Lee, T., Duan, Y., Wang, W., et al. (2000) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar000033j · Cited by 4,978 · see citing works
Statistical Mechanics of Fluid Mixtures
Kirkwood, J. G. (1935) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1749657 · Cited by 3,454 · see citing works
High‐Temperature Equation of State by a Perturbation Method. I. Nonpolar Gases
Zwanzig, R. (1954) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1740409 · Cited by 2,923 · see citing works
Efficient estimation of free energy differences from Monte Carlo data
Bennett, C. H. (1976) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(76)90078-4 · Cited by 2,631 · see citing works
Statistically optimal analysis of samples from multiple equilibrium states.
Shirts, M., & Chodera, J. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2978177 · Cited by 1,825 · see citing works
The statistical-thermodynamic basis for computation of binding affinities: a critical review
Gilson, M. K., Given, J. A., Bush, B. L., & McCammon, J. A. (1997) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(97)78756-3 · Cited by 1,222 · see citing works
Li, P., Roberts, B. P., Chakravorty, D. K., & Merz, K. M. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct400146w · Cited by 792 · see citing works
Calculation of absolute protein–ligand binding free energy from computer simulations
Woo, H.-J., & Roux, B. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0409005102 · Cited by 661 · see citing works
Absolute Binding Free Energies: A Quantitative Approach for Their Calculation
Boresch, S., Tettinger, F., Leitgeb, M., & Karplus, M. (2003) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp0217839 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Computations of Standard Binding Free Energies with Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Deng, Y., & Roux, B. (2009) · Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp807701h · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Swanson, J. M. J., Henchman, R. H., & McCammon, J. A. (2004) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(04)74084-9 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Role of diffusion in ligand binding to macromolecules and cell-bound receptors
Shoup, D., & Szabó, A. (1982) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(82)84455-x · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Predicting Binding Free Energies: Frontiers and Benchmarks
Mobley, D. L., & Gilson, M. K. (2017) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033654 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Wang, J., Deng, Y., & Roux, B. (2006) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.084301 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Standard Binding Free Energies from Computer Simulations: What Is the Best Strategy?
Gumbart, J. C., Roux, B., & Chipot, C. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct3008099 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Chandler, D., & Pratt, L. R. (1976) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.433529 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Phenol stabilizes more helix in a new symmetrical zinc insulin hexamer
Derewenda, U., Derewenda, Z. S., Dodson, E. J., Dodson, G. G., Reynolds, C. D., Smith, G. D., Sparks, C. A., & Swenson, D. C. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/338594a0 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Jorgensen, W. L., Buckner, J. K., Boudon, S., & Tirado‐Rives, J. (1988) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.454895 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Mobley, D. L., Chodera, J. D., & Dill, K. A. (2006) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2221683 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Hermans, J., & Wang, L. (1997) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja963568+ · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Best Practices for Alchemical Free Energy Calculations [Article v1.0]
Mey, A. S. J. S., Allen, B. K., Macdonald, H. E. B., Chodera, J. D., Hahn, D. F., Kuhn, M., Michel, J., Mobley, D. L., Naden, L. N., Prasad, S., et al. (2019) · Living Journal of Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.33011/livecoms.2.1.18378 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Calculation of Standard Binding Free Energies: Aromatic Molecules in the T4 Lysozyme L99A Mutant
Deng, Y., & Roux, B. (2006) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct060037v · Cited by 289 · see citing works
A cavity-containing mutant of T4 lysozyme is stabilized by buried benzene
Sauer-Eriksson, A. E., Baase, W. A., Wozniak, J. A., & Matthews, B. W. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/355371a0 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Roux, B., Nina, M., Pomès, R., & Smith, J. C. (1996) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79267-6 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Rocklin, G. J., Mobley, D. L., Dill, K. A., & Hünenberger, P. H. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4826261 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Perspective: Alchemical free energy calculations for drug discovery.
Mobley, D., & Klimovich, P. V. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4769292 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Miyamoto, S., & Kollman, P. A. (1993) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340160303 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Standard Free Energy of Binding from a One-Dimensional Potential of Mean Force
Doudou, S., Burton, N. A., & Henchman, R. H. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct8002354 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Direct calculation of the binding free energies of FKBP ligands
Fujitani, H., Tanida, Y., Ito, M., Jayachandran, G., Snow, C. D., Shirts, M. R., Sorin, E. J., & Pande, V. S. (2005) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1999637 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Computational prediction of protein–protein binding affinities
Siebenmorgen, T., & Zacharias, M. (2020) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1448 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Predicting ligand binding affinity with alchemical free energy methods in a polar model binding site
Boyce, S. E., Mobley, D., Rocklin, G., Graves, A. P., Dill, K., & Shoichet, B. (2009) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.09.049 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Theory of binless multi-state free energy estimation with applications to protein-ligand binding
Tan, Z., Gallicchio, E., Lapelosa, M., & Levy, R. M. (2012) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3701175 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Predictions of Ligand Selectivity from Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations
Aldeghi, M., Heifetz, A., Bodkin, M. J., Knapp, S., & Biggin, P. C. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b11467 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
On the calculation of absolute macromolecular binding free energies
Luo, H., & Sharp, K. A. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.162365999 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Rigorous Free Energy Simulations in Virtual Screening
Cournia, Z., Allen, B. K., Beuming, T., Pearlman, D., Radak, B., & Sherman, W. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00116 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Lu, N., Kofke, D. A., & Woolf, T. B. (2003) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.10369 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Hénin, J., Pohorille, A., & Chipot, C. J. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja050581y · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Self-citationCallahan, K. M., Casillas-Ituarte, N. N., Roeselová, M., Allen, H. C., & Tobias, D. J. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp909132a · Cited by 142 · see citing works
The Free Energy of Xenon Binding to Myoglobin from Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Hérmans, J. J., & Shankar, S. (1986) · Israel Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1002/ijch.198600032 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Effect of Carboxylate-Binding Mode on Metal Binding/Selectivity and Function in Proteins
Dudev, T., & Lim, C. (2006) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar068181i · Cited by 134 · see citing works
The geometry of calcium carboxylate interactions in crystalline complexes
Einspahr, H., & Bugg, C. E. (1981) · Acta Crystallographica Section B · doi:10.1107/s0567740881005037 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Evolution of Alchemical Free Energy Methods in Drug Discovery
Song, L. F., & Merz, K. M. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00547 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Determining equilibrium constants for dimerization reactions from molecular dynamics simulations
de Jong, D. H., Schäfer, L. V., de Vries, A. H., Marrink, . J., Berendsen, H. J. C., & Grubmüller, H. (2011) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21776 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Potential of mean force for protein–protein interaction studies
Jiang, L., Gao, Y.-D., Mao, F., Liu, Z., & Lai, L. (2002) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10031 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Martinek, T., Duboué-Dijon, E., Timr, Š., Mason, P. E., Baxová, K., Fischer, H. E., Schmidt, B., Pluhařová, E., & Jungwirth, P. (2018) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5006779 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Recent Theoretical and Computational Advances for Modeling Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities
Gallicchio, E., & Levy, R. (2011) · Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-386485-7.00002-8 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Convergence and Sampling in Determining Free Energy Landscapes for Membrane Protein Association
Domański, J., Hedger, G., Best, R. B., Stansfeld, P. J., & Sansom, M. S. P. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b08445 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Helms, V., & Wade, R. C. (1995) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(95)79955-6 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Insights into Membrane Protein–Lipid Interactions from Free Energy Calculations
Corey, R. A., Vickery, O. N., Sansom, M. S. P., & Stansfeld, P. J. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00548 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Massively parallel computation of absolute binding free energy with well-equilibrated states
Fujitani, H., Tanida, Y., & Matsuura, A. (2009) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.79.021914 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Interactions between amides in solution and the thermodynamics of weak binding
Jorgensen, W. L. (1989) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00192a057 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Symmetry Numbers for Rigid, Flexible, and Fluxional Molecules: Theory and Applications
Gilson, M. K., & Irikura, K. K. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp110434s · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Binding of divalent cations to acetate: molecular simulations guided by Raman spectroscopy
Mendes de Oliveira, D., Zukowski, S. R., Palivec, V., Hénin, J., Martinez-Seara, H., Ben-Amotz, D., Jungwirth, P., & Duboué-Dijon, E. (2020) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d0cp02987d · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationReif, M., & Oostenbrink, C. (2013) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.23490 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
General Anesthetics Predicted to Block the GLIC Pore with Micromolar Affinity
LeBard, D. N., Hénin, J., Eckenhoff, R. G., Klein, M. L., & Brannigan, G. H. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002532 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationSalari, R., Joseph, T. T., Lohia, R., Hénin, J., & Brannigan, G. H. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00447 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationOn the Theory of Noncovalent Binding
Mihailescu, M., & Gilson, M. K. (2004) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1529/biophysj.103.031682 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Hydration energy landscape of the active site cavity in cytochrome P450cam.
Helms, V., & Wade, R. C. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Engineering a model protein cavity to catalyze the Kemp elimination
Merski, M., & Shoichet, B. K. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1208076109 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
String Method for Protein–Protein Binding Free-Energy Calculations
Suh, D., Jo, S., Jiang, W., Chipot, C. J., & Roux, B. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00499 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Concepts and protocols for electrostatic free energies
Simonson, T., & Roux, B. (2016) · Molecular Simulation · doi:10.1080/08927022.2015.1121544 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
For Guldberg and Waage, with love and cratic entropy
Janin, J. (1996) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340240402 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
RASPD+: Fast Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Prediction Using Simplified Physicochemical Features
Holderbach, S., Adam, L., Jayaram, B., Wade, R. C., & Mukherjee, G. (2020) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2020.601065 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Quantifying Protein–Protein Interactions in Molecular Simulations
López, A. J., Quoika, P. K., Linke, M., Hummer, G., & Köfinger, J. (2020) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b11802 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Deng, N., Cui, D., Zhang, B. W., Xia, J., Cruz, J., & Levy, R. M. (2018) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c8cp01524d · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Pranata, J., & Jorgensen, W. L. (1991) · Tetrahedron · doi:10.1016/s0040-4020(01)81783-x · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Daily, M. D., Baer, M. D., & Mundy, C. J. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b12277 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Procacci, P. (2016) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2016.11.018 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Palivec, V., Viola, C., Kozak, M., Ganderton, T., Křížková, K., Turkenburg, J. P., Halušková, P., Žáková, L., Jiráček, J., Jungwirth, P., et al. (2017) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m117.775924 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Structure and Thermodynamics of Mg:Phosphate Interactions in Water: A Simulation Study
Kumar, M., Simonson, T., Ohanessian, G., & Clavaguéra, C. (2014) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201402685 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Yoshitake, S., Zhang, B. W., Levy, R., & Deng, N. (2019) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.26078 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Applications of Free Energy Calculations to Chemistry and Biology
Chipot, C. J., Mark, A. E., Pande, V. S., & Simonson, T. (2007) · Springer series in chemical physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-38448-9_13 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
The association constant of a flexible molecule and a single atom: Theory and simulation
Groot, R. D. (1992) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.462988 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Jakubec, D., & Vondrášek, J. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00006 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Gilson, M. K., & Irikura, K. K. (2013) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp401194k · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Hénin, J., Pohorille, A., & Chipot, C. J. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja104328f · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationMolecular association at the microscopic level
Neumann, R. (2011) · Canadian Journal of Physics · doi:10.1139/p11-058 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neighbor List Artifacts in Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Kim, H., Fábián, B., & Hummer, G. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00777 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Evaluating the use of absolute binding free energy in the fragment optimisation process
Alibay, I., Magarkar, A., Seeliger, D., & Biggin, P. (2022) · Communications Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s42004-022-00721-4 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Pedersen, K. B., Borges-Araújo, L., Stange, A. D., Souza, P. C. T., Marrink, . J., & Schiøtt, B. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00553 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Human Learning for Molecular Simulations: The Collective Variables Dashboard in VMD.
Hénin, J., Lopes, L. J. S., & Fiorin, G. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01081 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationMeta-Analysis Reveals That Absolute Binding Free-Energy Calculations Approach Chemical Accuracy
Fu, H., Zhou, Y.-B., Xiang, J., Shao, X., & Cai, W. (2022) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00796 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Clark, F., Robb, G. R., Cole, D. J., & Michel, J. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00139 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Alchemical Free Energy Calculations on Membrane-Associated Proteins
Papadourakis, M., Sinenka, H., Matricon, P. G., Hénin, J., Brannigan, G. H., Pérez‐Benito, L., Pande, V., van Vlijmen, H., de Graaf, C., Deflorian, F., et al. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00365 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationAutomated Adaptive Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations
Clark, F., Robb, G. R., Cole, D. J., & Michel, J. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00806 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
On Computing Equilibrium Binding Constants for Protein–Protein Association in Membranes
Majumder, A., Kwon, S., & Straub, J. E. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00106 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Subbotina, J., Rouse, I., & Lobaskin, V. (2023) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/d3nr03264g · Cited by 22 · see citing works
A Rigorous Framework for Calculating Protein–Protein Binding Affinities in Membranes
Blazhynska, M., Gumbart, J. C., Chen, H., Tajkhorshid, E., Roux, B., & Chipot, C. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00941 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Raafat, A., Mowafy, S., Abou‐Seri, S. M., Fouad, M. A., & Farag, N. A. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105526 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Puyo-Fourtine, J., Juillé, M., Hénin, J., Clavaguéra, C., & Duboué-Dijon, É. (2022) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c01158 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationStandard Binding Free-Energy Calculations: How Far Are We from Automation?
Fu, H., Chipot, C. J., Shao, X., & Cai, W. (2023) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c04370 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
On Analytical Corrections for Restraints in Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations
Boresch, S. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00442 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Symmetry-Adapted Restraints for Binding Free Energy Calculations
Ebrahimi, M., & Hénin, J. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01235 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationMachine Learning Derived Collective Variables for the Study of Protein Homodimerization in Membrane
Majumder, A., & Straub, J. E. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00454 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Larsen, A. H., Tata, L., John, L., & Sansom, M. S. P. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008807 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
How to obtain reaction free energies from free-energy profiles
Dietschreit, J. C. B., Diestler, D. J., & Ochsenfeld, C. (2022) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0083423 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations for Buried Water Molecules
Ge, Y., Baumann, H. M., & Mobley, D. L. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00658 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Reif, M., & Zacharias, M. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01194 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
The role of structural heterogeneity in the homodimerization of transmembrane proteins
Majumder, A., & Straub, J. E. (2023) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0159801 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
On the NS-DSSB unidirectional estimates in the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge
Procacci, P., & Macchiagodena, M. (2021) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-021-00419-0 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Statistical mechanics of dimerizations and its consequences for small systems
Zangi, R. (2022) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d2cp04450a · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Puyo-Fourtine, J., Zgarbová, M., Kantin, L., Jurečka, P., & Duboué-Dijon, É. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01262 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Majumder, A., & Straub, J. E. (2025) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c04286 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Bian, H., Shao, X., Cai, W., & Fu, H. (2024) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c00519 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Kubečka, J., Knattrup, Y., Trolle, G. B., Reischl, B., Lykke-Møller, A. S., Elm, J., & Neefjes, I. (2025) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.5c05634 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“As noted by Duboue ́ - Dijon and He ́ nin, 51 the integration in eq 6 depends on the definition of the bound state.”
Zoccante, A., Cara, E., Lupi, F. F., Hönicke, P., Kayser, Y., Beckhoff, B., Klapetek, P., Marchi, D., & Cossi, M. (2024) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d4cp01322k · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Binding reactions at finite systems
Zangi, R. (2022) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d1cp05984j · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Notari, E., Wood, C. W., & Michel, J. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01695 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Multimerizations, Aggregation, and Transfer Reactions of Small Numbers of Molecules
Zangi, R. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00774 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Automated Adaptive Absolute Binding FreeEnergy CalculationsPreprint
Clark, F., Robb, G. R., Cole, D. J., & Michel, J. (2024) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-3ft7f · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Bayesian Learning for Accurate and Robust Biomolecular Force Fields
Košťál, V., Shanks, B., Jungwirth, P., & Martinez‐Seara, H. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c02051 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“The binding free energy of a Ca 2 + ion to the EF-hand loop of troponin was calculated using the alchemical double decoupling technique, 48,49 as illustrated in the thermodynamic cycle in Figure 2.”
Drug Discovery by Automated Adaptation of Chemical Structure and Identity.
Patel, L. A., Chau, P., Debesai, S., Darwin, L., & Neale, C. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01271 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Evaluating the use of absolute binding free energy in the fragment optimization process.Preprint
Alibay, I., Magarkar, A., Seeliger, D., & Biggin, P. C. (2022) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-cw2kq · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sticky Salts: Overbinding of Monovalent Cations to Phosphorylations in All-Atom Force Fields
Marien, J., Puyo-Fourtine, J., Prévost, C., Sacquin‐Mora, S., & Duboué-Dijon, É. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5c02154 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Rahbar, M., & Stein, C. J. (2026) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/3twj-4279 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Beyond the 1:1 Ligand–Protein Paradigm: An In Silico Assay for Competitive Ligand BindingPreprint
Cardenas, V. B., Raniolo, S., Conflitti, P., & Limongelli, V. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.31.685849 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Inspired by protocols originally developed for estimating ligand binding affinities in unbiased atomistic simulations,[61–67] and recently adapted by our group for CG protein–ligand calculations,[49] we computed the absolute ligand/A 2A binding free energy ∆ G from the one-dimensional potential of…”
Puyo-Fourtine, J., Juillé, M., Hénin, J., Clavaguéra, C., & Duboué-Dijon, É. (2022) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-cjqqb
Self-citationEvaluating the use of absolute binding free energy in the fragment optimization process.Preprint
Alibay, I., Magarkar, A., Seeliger, D., & Biggin, P. C. (2022) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-cw2kq-v2
Notari, E., Wood, C. W., & Michel, J. (2024) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-t02df
Sticky salts: overbinding of monovalent cations to phosphorylations in all-atom forcefieldsPreprint
Marien, J., Puyo-Fourtine, J., Prévost, C., Sacquin‐Mora, S., & Duboué-Dijon, É. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.08.28.672842
“90,91 Contact and solvent-shared ion pair (SShIP) geometries were defined based on the first and second minima of the radial distribution function, g(r), between the cation and the P atom.”
Prusty, S., Majumder, A., & Straub, J. E. (2026) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0350494
Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study To Characterize Plutonyl–Calmodulin Interactions
Faux, E., Martinez, D. M., Sauge‐Merle, S., Berthomieu, C., Berthon, C., & Berthon, L. (2026) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6c02378
- Authors
- Duboué-Dijon, E., & Hénin, J.
- Affiliations
- CNRS, Université de Paris, UPR 9080, Laboratoire de Biochimie Théorique 1 , 13 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 75005 Paris, France
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Hénin, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2021-05-24
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 204101-204101
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W3127325433
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2021-06-09)
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Chemical Physics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-LABX-0011, ANR-11-EQPX-0008)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- absolute binding free energy, binding sites, homodimerization, conformational sampling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review