Cited by 87Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates

omg blueprint for trapped ion quantum computing with metastable states

Open access
Allcock, D. T. C., Campbell, W. C., Chiaverini, J., Chuang, I. L., Hudson, E. R., Moore, I. D., Ransford, A., Roman, C. +2 more·2021·Applied Physics Letters

Abstract

Quantum computers, much like their classical counterparts, will likely benefit from flexible qubit encodings that can be matched to different tasks. For trapped ion quantum processors, a common way to access multiple encodings is to use multiple, co-trapped atomic species. Here, we outline an alternative approach that allows flexible encoding capabilities in single-species systems through the use of long-lived metastable states as an effective, programmable second species. We describe the set of additional trapped ion primitives needed to enable this protocol and show that they are compatible with large-scale systems that are already in operation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/5.0069544

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 1,762-nm laser enables a ternary (three-outcome) measurement to detect leakage population without the use of ancillas or 2Q gates.

    “Furthermore, the 1,762-nm laser is used to protect neighbouring qubits from measurement crosstalk errors (Extended Data Fig. 1b) and enables a ternary (three-outcome) measurement to detect leakage population (Extended Data Fig. 1c) without the use of ancillas or 2Q gates79–81.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allcock, D. T. C., Campbell, W. C., Chiaverini, J., Chuang, I. L., Hudson, E. R., Moore, I. D., Ransford, A., Roman, C., Sage, J. M., & Wineland, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • MIT Lincoln Laboratory (US)
  • MIT-Harvard Center for Ultracold Atoms (US)
Corresponding author
Campbell, W. C.
Venue
Applied Physics Letters
Published
2021-11-22
Volume
119
Issue
21
ISSN
  • 0003-6951 (ISSN-L)
  • 1077-3118
OpenAlex
W3216098461
Cited by
87
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Physics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • United States Army Research Office (W911NF-20-1-0037)
  • NSF Center for Ultracold Atoms
  • National Science Foundation (2016244, OMA-2016245, PHY-1912555)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Keywords
trapped-ion quantum computing, metastable states, qubit encoding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review