Cited by 15Quantum optics and atomic interactionsQuantum Information and CryptographyCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates

Raman Scattering Errors in Stimulated-Raman-Induced Logic Gates in Ba+133

Open access
Boguslawski, Matthew J., Wall, Zachary J., Vizvary, Samuel R., Moore, Isam Daniel, Bareian, Michael, Allcock, David T. C., Wineland, David J., Hudson, Eric R. +1 more·2023·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

^{133}Ba^{+} is illuminated by a laser that is far detuned from optical transitions, and the resulting spontaneous Raman scattering rate is measured. The observed scattering rate is lower than previous theoretical estimates. The majority of the discrepancy is explained by a more accurate treatment of the scattered photon density of states. This work establishes that, contrary to previous models, there is no fundamental atomic physics limit to laser-driven quantum gates from laser-induced spontaneous Raman scattering.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.131.063001

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The accumulation of physical errors prevents the execution of large-scale algorithms in current quantum computers.

    “The accumulation of physical errors1–3 prevents the execution of large-scale algorithms in current quantum computers.”

    From High-threshold and low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory (2024) · cites this paper as [2]

    The opening discussion (p. 1) says that even the highest-fidelity trapped-ion gates remain below estimated thresholds for practical fault-tolerant quantum computers. This supports the general concern about physical errors, but the paper does not establish that accumulated errors prevent large-scale algorithms across current quantum computers generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]M. B. Plenio and P. L. Knight, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. 453 , 2017 (1997).
  2. [9]D. J. Wineland, M. Barrett, J. Britton, J. Chiaverini, B. DeMarco, W. M. Itano, B. Jelenkovi´ c, C. Langer, D. Leibfried, V. Meyer, T. Rosenband, and T. Sch¨ atz, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 361 , 1349 (2003).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boguslawski, M. J., Wall, Z. J., Vizvary, S. R., Moore, I. D., Bareian, M., Allcock, D. T. C., Wineland, D. J., Hudson, E. R., & Campbell, W. C.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
  • Boguslawski, Matthew J.
  • Wall, Zachary J.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2023-08-07
Volume
131
Issue
6
Pages
063001-063001
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W4385637799
Cited by
15
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-20-1-0037, W911NF-19-1-0297)
  • National Science Foundation (PHY-2110421, PHY-2207985, OMA-2016245)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Keywords
stimulated Raman scattering, 133Ba, photonic density of states, trapped ions, quantum gates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review