Cited by 15Superconducting Materials and ApplicationsFusion materials and technologiesParticle accelerators and beam dynamics

A facility for cryogenic ion irradiation and in situ characterization of rare-earth barium copper oxide superconducting tapes

Open access
Devitre, A. R., Fischer, D. X., Woller, K. B., Clark, B. C., Short, M. P., Whyte, D. G., Hartwig, Z. S.·2024·Review of Scientific Instruments

Abstract

Superconducting magnets based on Rare Earth Barium Copper Oxides (REBCO) offer transformative capabilities in the fields of fusion energy, high energy physics, and space exploration. A challenge shared by these applications is the limited lifetime of REBCO due to radiation damage sustained during operation. Here we present a new ion-beam facility that enables simultaneous cryogenic irradiation and in situ characterization of commercial REBCO tapes. The ion source provides spatially uniform fluxes up to 1018 protons/m2s with kinetic energies up to 3.4 MeV, in addition to helium and higher-Z species. Using this facility, we can induce uniform damage profiles in the first 10–20 µm of REBCO tapes with less than 0.25 appm of hydrogen implanted in REBCO after a dose of 1020 protons/m2. The tape can be held between 20 and 300 K with an accuracy of ±0.1 K and is connected to a four-point probe measuring the critical current, Ic, and critical temperature, Tc, before, during, and after irradiation with transport current ranging from 100 nA to 100 A, and a typical voltage noise less than 0.1 μV. These capabilities are presently used to study the effect of irradiation temperature on REBCO performance change during and after proton bombardment, to assess the possibility of Ic and Tc recovery after irradiation through thermal annealing, and to explore the instantaneous and recoverable suppression of Ic and Tc observed during irradiation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/5.0200936

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The relevant literature has primarily focused on the electrical properties of magnet materials, leaving a notable gap in the understanding of thermo-mechanical property evolution under FPP operating conditions.

    “The relevant literature has primarily focused on the electrical properties of magnet materials [3, 4, 5], leaving a notable gap in the understanding of thermo-mechanical property evolution under FPP operating conditions.”
  • Only irradiations performed near the operating temperature of the magnet are unambiguous and useful for predicting changes in magnet material properties.

    “Therefore, only irradiations performed near the operating temperature of the magnet are unambiguous and, thus, useful for predicting changes in magnet material properties [3].”
  • The relevant literature has primarily focused on the electrical properties of magnet materials, leaving a notable gap in understanding thermo-mechanical property evolution under fusion power plant operating conditions.

    “The relevant literature has primarily focused on the electrical properties of magnet materials [3, 4, 5], leaving a notable gap in the understanding of thermo-mechanical property evolution under FPP operating conditions.”
  • Only irradiations performed near the operating temperature of the magnet are unambiguous and useful for predicting changes in magnet material properties.

    “Therefore, only irradiations performed near the operating temperature of the magnet are unambiguous and, thus, useful for predicting changes in magnet material properties [3].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 15

Authors
Devitre, A. R., Fischer, D. X., Woller, K. B., Clark, B. C., Short, M. P., Whyte, D. G., & Hartwig, Z. S.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Devitre, A. R.
Venue
Review of Scientific Instruments
Published
2024-06-01
Volume
95
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0034-6748 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7623
OpenAlex
W4400044686
Cited by
15
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Review of Scientific Instruments (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Superconducting Materials and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Fusion materials and technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
Keywords
rare-earth barium copper oxide, REBCO superconducting tapes, radiation damage, proton irradiation, in situ characterization, critical current, critical temperature, hydrogen implantation, irradiation temperature effects, annealing, superconducting magnets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review