Cited by 342Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseases

Efficacy of combination treatment with anti-IgE plus specific immunotherapy in polysensitized children and adolescents with seasonal allergic rhinitis

Open access
Kuehr, Joachim, Brauburger, Jens, Zielen, Stefan, Schauer, Uwe, Kamin, Wolfgang, Von Berg, Andrea, Leupold, Wolfgang, Bergmann, Karl-Christian +4 more·2002·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Background Specific immunotherapy (SIT) and treatment with monoclonal anti-IgE antibody have complementary modes of action.Objective The purpose of this study was to determine whether combined therapy could provide better efficacy than either treatment alone.Methods We conducted a randomized, double-blinded trial to assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered anti-IgE (omalizumab) or placebo in children and adolescents with seasonal allergic rhinitis in both a birch pollen season and a grass pollen season (sequential seasons together lasting an average of 84 days). There were 4 treatment arms. Each subject was started on SIT-birch or SIT-grass, and anti-IgE or placebo was started before and maintained during the anticipated pollen seasons (a total of 24 weeks). The primary efficacy variable was symptom load, the sum of daily symptom severity score plus rescue medication use.Results A total of 221 subjects (intent-to-treat population) aged 6 to 17 years were analyzed for efficacy. Combination therapy reduced symptom load over the 2 pollen seasons by 48% (P <.001) over SIT alone. When analyzed separately by season, the 2 groups receiving unrelated SIT were considered placebo controls. In the grass season, symptom loads were as follows: unrelated (birch) SIT + placebo, 0.89 (reference value); unrelated (birch) SIT + anti-IgE, 0.49 (-45%); SIT-grass + placebo, 0.61 (-32%); SIT-grass + anti-IgE, 0.26 (-71%).Conclusion Anti-IgE therapy conferred a protective effect independent of the type of allergen. Additional clinical benefit was demonstrated in both pollen seasons, whether there was coverage by SIT or not. This combination might prove useful for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, particularly for polysensitized patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1067/mai.2002.121949

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combination omalizumab and AIT decreases the incidence of AIT-associated systemic allergic reactions and improves control of AR symptoms.

    “Two benefits of combination therapy have been described: decreased incidence of AIT-associated systemic allergic reactions and improved control of AR symptoms.1400-1402,1734-1736”

    From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [1400]

    The Abstract reports that combination therapy reduced allergic-rhinitis symptom load by 48% compared with immunotherapy alone. The discussion describes a reduction in immunotherapy-induced systemic reactions only as a speculative possibility and says a study was planned to investigate it; the Safety section does not establish a decreased incidence. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In 221 adolescents with moderate-to-severe AR and birch and grass pollen sensitization, combination therapy was superior to AIT alone, with a 48% reduction in symptom load during an entire pollen season.

    “Kuehr et al.1400 evaluated 221 adolescents (6 to 17 years) with moderate to severe AR and sensitization to birch and grass pollen. Using a randomized, controlled design, the effectiveness of combination therapy was evaluated during sequential birch and grass pollen seasons, with comparison of AIT +/− concurrent omalizumab. Significant findings included superiority of combination therapies vs AIT”

    From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [1400]

    The Methods (page unavailable) describe children and adolescents aged 6–17 with confirmed birch and grass pollen sensitization. The Efficacy section (page unavailable) reports a 48% lower median symptom load across the combined birch and grass seasons with SIT plus omalizumab than with SIT alone. Our copy does not establish that all 221 participants had moderate-to-severe rhinitis, and the study included children as well as adolescents. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In that trial, combination therapy reduced the median rescue medication score by 80% compared with AIT alone.

    “and 80% reduction in median rescue medication score.”

    From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [1400]

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuehr, J., Brauburger, J., Zielen, S., Schauer, U., Kamin, W., Von Berg, A., Leupold, W., Bergmann, K.-C., Rolinck-Werninghaus, C., Gräve, M., Hultsch, T., & Wahn, U.
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Novartis (Germany) (DE)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Auguste-Viktoria-Klinik (DE)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-02
Volume
109
Issue
2
Pages
274-280
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162051917
Cited by
342
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
FWCI
9.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
omalizumab, anti-IgE therapy, allergen immunotherapy, allergic rhinitis, polysensitized patients, combination therapy, birch pollen allergy, grass pollen allergy, children and adolescents, symptom burden, rescue medication use
MeSH terms
Omalizumab, Adolescent, Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Child, Combined Modality Therapy, Desensitization, Immunologic, Double-Blind Method, Female, Poaceae, Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal, Humans, Immunoglobulin E, Male, Pollen, Treatment Outcome, Anti-Allergic Agents, Betula, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review