Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Coordinate induction of both cytochrome P4503A and MDR1 by St John's wort in healthy subjects

Dresser, George K., Schwarz, Ute I., Wilkinson, Grant R., Kim, Richard B.·2003·Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Background: Many drugs are cosubstrates of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and MDR1; furthermore, their disposition is markedly affected by pretreatment with inducing agents, including St John's wort. Such drug interactions reflect induction of both proteins through a common mechanism involving the steroid X receptor/pregnane X receptor. However, the relative contributions of enhanced metabolism and efflux transport to the overall induction process are unknown. Methods: The effects of 12 days' pretreatment with St John's wort on the disposition of selected in vivo probe drugs were determined in 21 young healthy subjects. Midazolam after oral and intravenous administration was used to assess CYP3A activity in both the intestinal epithelium and the liver, whereas the disposition of fexofenadine after an oral dose was assumed to be a measure of MDR1 function, and the oral plasma concentration‐time profile of cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin) was considered to reflect both CYP3A and MDR1 activities. Results: St John's wort markedly affected the plasma concentration‐time profiles of all of the drugs, with associated increases in their clearance. With midazolam, the enhancement was considerably less after intravenous administration (approximately 1.5‐fold) than after oral administration (approximately 2.7‐fold), and estimated intestinal and hepatic extraction ratios were higher by approximately 1.2‐ to 1.4‐fold. By contrast, the oral clearances of fexofenadine and cyclosporine were equally increased by approximately 1.6‐fold and 1.9‐fold, respectively; these changes were both statistically less than for midazolam's oral clearance and greater than its estimated intestinal extraction. Conclusions: Although the disposition of all 3 drugs was altered by St John's wort, the extent of induction measured by oral clearance was different with CYP3A activity (midazolam), apparently increasing more than MDR1 function (fexofenadine), whereas with cyclosporine the change in oral clearance appeared to be more closely associated with the increase in MDR1 rather than CYP3A, despite the fact that both proteins are importantly involved in its disposition. These discordances indicate that, although a common molecular mechanism may be involved, the quantitative aspects of induction are complex and depend on the particular drug and the relative contributions of CYP3A and MDR1 in its disposition. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2003) 73, 41–50; doi: 10.1067/mcp.2003.10

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1067/mcp.2003.10

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Dresser, G. K., Schwarz, U. I., Wilkinson, G. R., & Kim, R. B.
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
41-50
ISSN
  • 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6535
OpenAlex
W2034432716
Cited by
261
References
0
FWCI
20.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.