Cited by 91Endometriosis Research and TreatmentUterine Myomas and TreatmentsGynecological conditions and treatments

Disruption of the endometrial-myometrial border during pregnancy as a risk factor for adenomyosis

Curtis, Kathryn M., Hillis, Susan D., Marchbanks, Polly A., Peterson, Herbert B.·2002·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

We assessed surgical disruption of the endometrial-myometrial border during pregnancy as a risk factor for adenomyosis in a cohort of 1850 women undergoing hysterectomy during 1978 to 1981. Women who had 3 or more abortions when sharp curettage was common were at increased risk for adenomyosis; women who had curettage procedures or cesarean deliveries were not.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1067/mob.2002.124285

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A history of dilatation and curettage (D&C) procedures is a risk factor for adenomyosis.

    “A preponderance of evidence suggests that a history of receiving dilatation and curettage (D&C) procedures is a risk factor for adenomyosis [19,20,21,22].”

    From The Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis vis-à-vis Endometriosis (2020) · cites this paper as [21]

  • The EMID model is consistent with published data showing increased risk of adenomyosis in women with a history of D&C or in multiparous women.

    “The model also seems to be consistent with published data, i.e., an increased risk of adenomyosis in women with a history of D&C or in multiparous women [19,20,21,22].”

    From The Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis vis-à-vis Endometriosis (2020) · cites this paper as [21]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curtis, K. M., Hillis, S. D., Marchbanks, P. A., & Peterson, H. B.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
187
Issue
3
Pages
543-544
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056479931
Cited by
91
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
adenomyosis, pregnancy, risk factors, hysterectomy, abortion, curettage, cesarean section
MeSH terms
Abortion, Induced, Dilatation and Curettage, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review