Cited by 170Endometriosis Research and TreatmentPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisReproductive System and Pregnancy

Adenomyosis and risk of preterm delivery

Juang, C‐M, Chou, P, Yen, M‐S, Twu, N‐F, Horng, H‐C, Hsu, W‐L·2007·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of preterm delivery in patients with adenomyosis. DESIGN: A 1:2 nested case-control study. SETTING: Tertiary-care institution. POPULATION: A base cohort population of 2138 pregnant women who attended routine prenatal check-up between July 1999 and June 2005. METHODS: From this base cohort population, gravid women with singleton pregnancy who delivered prior to the completion of 37 weeks of gestation were identified and formed the study group. Singleton gravid women who had term delivery and who matched with age, body mass index, smoking, and status of previous preterm delivery were recruited concurrently and served as control group. Preterm delivery cases were further divided into spontaneous preterm delivery and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) cases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk analysis of preterm delivery between gravid women with and without adenomyosis. RESULTS: One-hundred and four preterm delivery case subjects and 208 control subjects were assessed. Overall, gravid women with adenomyosis were associated with significantly increased risk of preterm delivery (adjusted odds ratio 1.96, 95% CI 1.23-4.47, P=0.022). For subgroup analysis, gravid women with adenomyosis had an adjusted 1.84-fold risk of spontaneous preterm delivery (95% CI 1.32-4.31, P=0.012) and an adjusted 1.98-fold risk of PPROM (95% CI 1.39-3.15, P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Gravid women with adenomyosis were associated with increased risk of both spontaneous preterm delivery and PPROM. A common pathophysiological pathway may exist in these two disorders. Further in-depth biochemical and molecular studies are necessary to explore this phenomenon.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01186.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Juang, C., Chou, P., Yen, M., Twu, N., Horng, H., & Hsu, W.
Affiliations
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW)
  • National Yang Ming University (TW)
Corresponding author
Juang, C‐M
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01-09
Volume
114
Issue
2
Pages
165-169
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2088260572
Cited by
170
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
Keywords
adenomyosis, preterm birth, preterm premature rupture of membranes, spontaneous preterm labor, pregnancy outcomes, singleton pregnancy, risk factors
MeSH terms
Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Myometrium, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Uterine Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review