Cited by 197Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Elevated blood pressure and decreased cognitive function among school-age children and adolescents in the United States

Lande, Marc B, Kaczorowski, Jeffrey M, Auinger, Peggy, Schwartz, George J, Weitzman, Michael·2003·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the relationship between elevated blood pressure (BP) and cognitive test performance in a nationally representative sample of children. Study design The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III provides cross-sectional data for children 6 to 16 years, including BP and cognitive test scores. Elevated BP was defined as systolic or diastolic BP >or=90th percentile. Cognitive tests were compared for children with elevated and normal BP. Linear regression was used to evaluate the relation between elevated BP and decreased test scores. Results Among the 5077 children, 3.4% had systolic BP >or=90th percentile and 1.6% diastolic BP >or=90th percentile. Children with elevated systolic BP had lower average scores compared with normotensive children for digit span (7.9 vs 8.7, P=.01), block design (8.6 vs 9.5, P=.03), and mathematics (89.6 vs 93.8, P=.01). Elevated diastolic BP was associated with lower average scores on block design (9.5 vs 11, P=.01). Linear regression showed that elevated systolic BP was independently associated with lower digit span scores (P=.032). Conclusion Children with elevation of systolic BP are at risk for central nervous system end-organ damage, as manifested by decreased digit span test scores.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1067/s0022-3476(03)00412-8

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low academic achievement is strongly associated with risk-taking behavior, compromised health status, and reduced longevity.

    “Conversely, low academic achievement is strongly associated with risk-taking behavior, compromised health status, and reduced longevity.22–33”

    From School-Based Health Centers to Advance Health Equity (2016) · cites this paper as [22]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lande, M. B., Kaczorowski, J. M., Auinger, P., Schwartz, G. J., & Weitzman, M.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Lande, Marc B
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-12
Volume
143
Issue
6
Pages
720-724
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081457754
Cited by
197
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 18
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
elevated blood pressure, pediatric hypertension, cognitive function, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, digit span, block designs, mathematics achievement, elementary school students, adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Blood Pressure, Child, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Nutrition Surveys, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review