The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Elusive Concept of Localization Economies: Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of Spatial Clustering
Abstract
A number of possible advantages of industry agglomeration—or spatial clustering—have been identified in the research literature, notably those related to shared costs for infrastructure, the build-up of a skilled labour force, transaction efficiency, and knowledge spillovers leading to firm learning and innovation. We identify two shortcomings of existing research on the clustering phenomenon. First, the abundance of theoretical concepts and explanations stands in sharp contrast with the general lack of work aimed at validating these mechanisms empirically and the contradictory evidence found in recent empirical work in the field. Second, there is still a lack of a unified theoretical framework for analyzing spatial clustering. In an attempt to remedy the latter shortcoming, this paper investigates the nature of the cluster from a knowledge-creation or learning perspective. We argue for the need to establish a specific theory of the cluster where learning occupies centre stage. The basic requirements for such a theory of the cluster are discussed. Two main components of such a theory are identified: it must explain the existence of the cluster on the one hand and its internal organization on the other.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Storper, M. (1995) · European Urban and Regional Studies · doi:10.1177/096977649500200301 · Cited by 1,595
Cited by
The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems
Spigel, B. (2017) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12167 · Cited by 2,257
Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program
Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258721998948 · Cited by 789
“…1996 ), first with the early work on national systems of innovation ( Freeman, 1995; Lundvall, 1992 ), learning regions ( Keeble et al., 1999 ; Malmberg & Maskell, 2002 ) the Triple Helix ( Leydesdorff & Etzkowitz, 1996 ) and then with the larger literatures on regional clusters ( Delgado et…”
Cluster life cycles--dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution
Menzel, M.-P., & Fornahl, D. (2010) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtp036 · Cited by 677
Boschma, R. A., & ter Wal, A. L. J. (2007) · Industry & Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662710701253441 · Cited by 657
The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration
Ponds, R., Van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2007) · Papers in Regional Science · doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00126.x · Cited by 645
Metadata
- Authors
- Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 429-449
- ISSN
- 0308-518X (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3409
- OpenAlex
- W2150606135
- Cited by
- 1,417
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 105.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Elusive Concept of Localization Economies: Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of Spatial Clustering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/a3457
- The paper
- Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2002). The Elusive Concept of Localization Economies: Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of Spatial Clustering. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3457
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.