The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of Land-Use Change Patterns in the Netherlands
Open accessAbstract
Land-use-change patterns are the result of the complex interaction between the human and the physical environment. Case studies of the determinants of land-use change can help to analyse which theory is appropriate in a particular region and stimulate the development of new theoretic understandings. In this paper an empirical method is presented to analyse the pattern of land-use change that allows a wide range of factors, from different disciplines, to contribute to the explanation of land-use change. The method is applied to the Netherlands, based on an extensive database of land-use change and its potential determinants. Historic as well as recent land-use changes are studied. Historic land-use change is related mainly to the variation in the biophysical environment. Levels of explanation are low because of the inability to address the temporal variation in location factors. For the recent changes in land use high levels of explanation are obtained. The most important changes during this period are expansions of residential, industrial/commercial, and recreational areas. The location of these changes can be explained by a combination of accessibility measures, spatial policies, and neighbourhood interactions. On the basis of these results it is possible to define priority topics for in-depth analysis of land-use-change processes and suggest factors, relations, and processes that need to be included in dynamic land-use-change models that support land-use-planning policies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
‘Roads, land use, and deforestation: a spatial model applied to Belize’
Chomitz, K. M., & Gray, D. A. (1996) · The World Bank Economic Review · doi:10.1093/wber/10.3.487 · Cited by 729
Cited by
van Asselen, S., & Verburg, P. H. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12331 · Cited by 411
Self-citationDownscaling of land use change scenarios to assess the dynamics of European landscapes
Verburg, P. H., Schulp, C. J. E., Witte, N., & Veldkamp, A. (2006) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.024 · Cited by 388
Self-citationZisopoulou, K., & Panagoulia, D. (2021) · Water · doi:10.3390/w13121693 · Cited by 45
Muhammad, S., de Jong, T., & Ottens, H. F. L. (2008) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.05.005 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Verburg, P. H., van Eck, J. R. R., de Nijs, T. C. M., Dijst, M. J., & Schot, P.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125-150
- ISSN
- 0265-8135 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3417
- DOI
- 10.1068/b307
- OpenAlex
- W2042289381
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.