The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A Comparative Study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets
Abstract
Within the framework of Web 2.0 mapping applications, the most striking example of a geographical application is the OpenStreetMap (OSM) project. OSM aims to create a free digital map of the world and is implemented through the engagement of participants in a mode similar to software development in Open Source projects. The information is collected by many participants, collated on a central database, and distributed in multiple digital formats through the World Wide Web. This type of information was termed ‘Volunteered Geographical Information’ (VGI) by Goodchild, 2007. However, to date there has been no systematic analysis of the quality of VGI. This study aims to fill this gap by analysing OSM information. The examination focuses on analysis of its quality through a comparison with Ordnance Survey (OS) datasets. The analysis focuses on London and England, since OSM started in London in August 2004 and therefore the study of these geographies provides the best understanding of the achievements and difficulties of VGI. The analysis shows that OSM information can be fairly accurate: on average within about 6 m of the position recorded by the OS, and with approximately 80% overlap of motorway objects between the two datasets. In the space of four years, OSM has captured about 29% of the area of England, of which approximately 24% are digitised lines without a complete set of attributes. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of the findings to the study of VGI as well as suggesting future research directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography
Goodchild, M. F. (2007) · GeoJournal · doi:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y · Cited by 4,522
Wikinomics: how mass collaboration changes everything
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-6933 · Cited by 3,367
OpenStreetMap: User-Generated Street Maps
Haklay, M., & Weber, P. (2008) · IEEE Pervasive Computing · doi:10.1109/mprv.2008.80 · Cited by 3,194
Self-citationThe world is flat: a brief history of the twenty-first century
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-4141 · Cited by 1,634
Geographical information science
Goodchild, M. F. (1992) · International journal of geographical information systems · doi:10.1080/02693799208901893 · Cited by 967
Commons-based Peer Production and Virtue
Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00235.x · Cited by 890 · cited 2×
“This ‘Commons-Based Peer Production’ has attracted significant attention (Benkler and Nissenbaum, 2006).”
BackgroundGeographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries.
McNicoll, G., BURROUGH, P. A., & Frank, A. U. (1997) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/2137558 · Cited by 719
Web Mapping 2.0: The Neogeography of the GeoWeb
Haklay, M., Singleton, A., & Parker, C. (2008) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00167.x · Cited by 567
Self-citationIntegrating GIS and spatial data analysis: problems and possibilities
GOODCHILD, M., HAINING, R., & WISE, S. (1992) · International journal of geographical information systems · doi:10.1080/02693799208901923 · Cited by 363
A simple positional accuracy measure for linear features
GOODCHILD, M. F., & HUNTER, G. J. (1997) · International Journal of Geographical Information Science · doi:10.1080/136588197242419 · Cited by 333
Cited by
Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information
Goodchild, M. F., & Li, L. (2012) · Spatial Statistics · doi:10.1016/j.spasta.2012.03.002 · Cited by 771
Geospatial big data handling theory and methods: A review and research challenges
Li, S., Dragicevic, S., Castro, F. A., Sester, M., Winter, S., Coltekin, A., Pettit, C., Jiang, B., Haworth, J., Stein, A., et al. (2016) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.10.012 · Cited by 749
Kennedy, C. M., Oakleaf, J. R., Theobald, D. M., Baruch‐Mordo, S., & Kiesecker, J. (2019) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14549 · Cited by 722
A systematic review of a digital twin city: A new pattern of urban governance toward smart cities
Deng, T., Zhang, K., & Shen, Z.-J. (. (2021) · Journal of Management Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jmse.2021.03.003 · Cited by 532
Global Maps of Travel Time to Healthcare Facilities
Weiss, D. J., Nelson, A., Vargas-Ruiz, C. A., Gligorić, K., Bavadekar, S., Gabrilovich, E., Bertozzi-Villa, A., Rozier, J., Gibson, H. S., Shekel, T., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-1059-1 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Haklay, M.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 682-703
- ISSN
- 0265-8135 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3417
- OpenAlex
- W2063935068
- Cited by
- 1,632
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 413.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A Comparative Study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/b35097
- The paper
- Haklay, M. (2010). How Good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A Comparative Study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. https://doi.org/10.1068/b35097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
