The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-Based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions
Open accessAbstract
The challenges of sustainable development (and climate change and peak oil, in particular) demand system-wide transformations in sociotechnical systems of provision. An academic literature around coevolutionary innovation for sustainability has recently emerged as an attempt to understand the dynamics and directions of such sociotechnical transformations, which are termed ‘sustainability transitions’. This literature has previously focused on market-based technological innovations. Here we apply it to a new context of civil-society-based social innovation and examine the role of community-based initiatives in a transition to a low-carbon sustainable economy in the UK. We present new empirical research from a study of the UK's Transition Towns movement (a ‘grassroots innovation’) and assess its attempts to grow and influence wider societal sociotechnical systems. By applying strategic niche management theory to this civil society context, we deliver theoretically informed practical recommendations for this movement to diffuse beyond its niche: to foster deeper engagement with resourceful regime actors; to manage expectations more realistically by delivering tangible opportunities for action and participation; and to embrace a community-based, action-oriented model of social change (in preference to a cognitive theory of behaviour change). Furthermore, our study indicates areas where theory can be refined to better explain the growth and broader impacts of grassroots innovations—namely, through a fuller appreciation of the importance of internal niche processes, by understanding the important role of identity and group formation, and by resolving how social practices change in grassroots innovations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 · Cited by 5,245
Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537329808524310 · Cited by 2,860
The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions
Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005 · Cited by 2,238
More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy
Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & van Asselt, M. (2001) · Foresight · doi:10.1108/14636680110803003 · Cited by 2,100
Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537320802292651 · Cited by 2,025
Jackson, T. (2009) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781849774338 · Cited by 2,018
Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda
Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644010701419121 · Cited by 1,777
Self-citationOntologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective
Geels, F. W. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022 · Cited by 1,718 · cited 1×
“…a literature on sustainability transitions has emerged which posits a multilevel perspective (MLP) to capture the dialectical relationships between microlevel actors and macrolevel structures (Geels, 2005a; 2010; Loorbach, 2007; Rip and Kemp, 1998; Rotmans et al, 2001; Smith et al, 2005; 2010).”
BackgroundSmith, A., Voß, J.-P., & Grin, J. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023 · Cited by 1,691
Grin, J., Rotmans, J. I., & Schot, J. (2010) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 1,276
Cited by
An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions
Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., et al. (2019) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 · Cited by 2,800
Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change
Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340 · Cited by 1,401
Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-actor Perspective
Avelino, F., & Wittmayer, J. M. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2015.1112259 · Cited by 838
Sustainability transformations: a resilience perspective
Olsson, P., Galaz, V., & Boonstra, W. J. (2014) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-06799-190401 · Cited by 721
Experimenting for sustainability transitions: A systematic literature review
Sengers, F., Wieczorek, A. J., & Raven, R. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031 · Cited by 615
Metadata
- Authors
- Seyfang, G., & Haxeltine, A.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-01-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 381-400
- ISSN
- 0263-774X (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3425
- OpenAlex
- W2117401019
- Cited by
- 1,014
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 31.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-Based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/c10222
- The paper
- Seyfang, G., & Haxeltine, A. (2012). Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-Based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1068/c10222
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.