CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 103University-Industry-Government Innovation ModelsManagement and Organizational StudiesInnovation and Knowledge Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Institutional Entrepreneurship, Power, and Knowledge in Innovation Systems: Institutionalization of Regenerative Medicine in Tampere, Finland

Open access
Sotarauta, Markku, Mustikkamäki, Nina·2015·Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy
DOI 10.1068/c12297r
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In this paper we ask what is the place of institutional entrepreneurship in a (regional) innovation system. The main research questions addressed are (a) how does a new science-based concentration of innovation become institutionalized in an innovation system; (b) who are the institutional entrepreneurs and what do they actually do in their efforts to institutionalize new beliefs, practices, and activities within a system; and (c) what knowledge do institutional entrepreneurs need and what kind of power do they exercise in the institutionalization process. We add new knowledge to studies focusing on innovation systems by revealing how new elements are attached into it. We also add power and knowledge to the study of institutional entrepreneurship and institutional change. The empirical analysis identifies the main phases of institutionalization, key actors in different phases, and their strategies of influence. This paper is based on the analysis of secondary data and twenty-eight interviews with key actors.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1068/c12297r

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 60 references

1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Brown N, 2003, Science Studies, 16, 3
  2. DiMaggio P J, 1988, Institutional Patterns and Organizations, 3
  3. Kulve H, 2010, Science, Technology and Innovation Studies, 6, 7
  4. Nordforsk, 2007, Stem Cell Research in Nordic Countries. Science, Ethics, Public Debate and Law for Nordforsk by the Nordic Committee on Bioethics
  5. Regea, 2009, Regea Institute for Regenerative Medicine—Annual Report 2009
  6. Regea, 2010, Regea Institute for Regenerative Medicine
  7. Valtakari M, 2007, Biomateriaaliosaamisesta liiketoimintaa; COMBIO-teknologiaohjelman loppuarviointi

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 103

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sotarauta, M., & Mustikkamäki, N.
Affiliations
Tampere University (FI)
Corresponding author
  • Sotarauta, Markku
  • Mustikkamäki, Nina
ORCID
Sotarauta, Markku
Venue
Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2015-01-01
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
342-357
ISSN
  • 0263-774X (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-3425
DOI
10.1068/c12297r
OpenAlex
W2044094119
Cited by
100
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5
FWCI
14.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Environment and Planning C Government and Policy (publishedVersion)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
institutional entrepreneurship, institutionalization, innovation systems, regenerative medicine, regional innovation systems, power and knowledge, institutional change, Tampere

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review