The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making Sense: Embodiment and the Sensibilities of the Everyday
Open accessAbstract
Recently social analysis has turned its attention to ‘the body’. In this paper the author considers the implications of such a turn for social analysis itself. The main discussion of the paper concerns the indeterminate or ‘elusory’ nature of embodiment and its productive relation to ‘sense making’ in everyday life and contemplative thought. The author examines how these aspects of embodiment have been marginalised within social analysis and the effects of this marginalisation in understandings of subjectification. Describing the processes of subjectification in terms of ‘habit’ and ‘style’, the author suggests that the disclosive and performative in the everyday have been ignored in favour of a search for the foundations of the everyday and the subject. An argument is put forward for the groundlessness of being in terms of its potential to be otherwise. The above discussions are described in terms of the ability of collectives to make sense from the fleeting and ephemeral feelings and experiences of everyday on-going comportment. Finally it is suggested that through a consideration of the performative, collective, and material nature of embodiment contemplations of everyday life should be understood in terms of enaction and immanence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Massumi, B. (1995) · Cultural Critique · doi:10.2307/1354446 · Cited by 1,828
Cited by
National Identity, Popular Culture and Everyday Life
Edensor, T. (2020) · doi:10.4324/9781003086178 · Cited by 780
Lorimer, J. (2007) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d71j · Cited by 719
An event of geographical ethics in spaces of affect
McCormack, D. P. (2003) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.0020-2754.2003.00106.x · Cited by 494
Moving cities: rethinking the materialities of urban geographies
Latham, A., & McCormack, D. P. (2004) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/0309132504ph515oa · Cited by 395
What else? some more ways of thinking and doing ‘Children's Geographies’
Horton, J., & Kraftl, P. (2006) · Children's Geographies · doi:10.1080/14733280600577459 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrison, P.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 497-517
- ISSN
- 0263-7758 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3433
- OpenAlex
- W2108234467
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making Sense: Embodiment and the Sensibilities of the Everyday. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/d195t
- The paper
- Harrison, P. (2000). Making Sense: Embodiment and the Sensibilities of the Everyday. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. https://doi.org/10.1068/d195t
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.