Cited by 148Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityWaste Management and RecyclingFood, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices

Binning, Gifting and Recovery: The Conduits of Disposal in Household Food Consumption

Evans, David·2012·Environment and Planning D: Society and Space

Abstract

This paper explores the movements and placings that work to configure food as waste. At issue here—following the work of Nicky Gregson, Kevin Hetherington, and Rolland Munro—are the multiple conduits that exist for ‘moving things along’ and the idea that consumption research needs to move beyond the unfortunate conjunction of disposal and waste. I suggest that the disposal of surplus food is enacted via a graduated process in which it first enters a ‘gap’ where ambiguities and anxieties surrounding its residual value and onward trajectory are addressed. Drawing on ethnographic examples, I explore the shifting contours and gradients that reduce the possibilities for disposing of food through conduits in which it can be handed down, handed around, or otherwise saved from wastage. I also unpack the overwhelming tendency for surplus food to be cast as ‘excess’ and placed in conduits—typically the bin—that connect it to the waste stream. Crucially, it is suggested that food is a specific genre of material culture and that this underpins the normativity of its binning alongside the attendant prevention of its recirculation or recovery. To conclude, I reflect on the broader implications of this analysis for understandings of consumption, disposal, and waste.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1068/d22210

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In some families, a 'maturation time' diminished the guilt that occurred when an edible food was discarded.

    “In some families, we identified a 'maturation time' that diminished the guilt that occurred when an edible food was discarded, an aspect also noted by Evans (2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, D.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Evans, David
Venue
Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
Published
2012-01-01
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
1123-1137
ISSN
  • 0263-7758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-3433
OpenAlex
W2053141095
Cited by
148
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environment and Planning D Society and Space (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
Keywords
food surplus, food waste, household food consumption, food disposal, gift-giving, food recovery, food circulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review