Binning, Gifting and Recovery: The Conduits of Disposal in Household Food Consumption
Abstract
This paper explores the movements and placings that work to configure food as waste. At issue here—following the work of Nicky Gregson, Kevin Hetherington, and Rolland Munro—are the multiple conduits that exist for ‘moving things along’ and the idea that consumption research needs to move beyond the unfortunate conjunction of disposal and waste. I suggest that the disposal of surplus food is enacted via a graduated process in which it first enters a ‘gap’ where ambiguities and anxieties surrounding its residual value and onward trajectory are addressed. Drawing on ethnographic examples, I explore the shifting contours and gradients that reduce the possibilities for disposing of food through conduits in which it can be handed down, handed around, or otherwise saved from wastage. I also unpack the overwhelming tendency for surplus food to be cast as ‘excess’ and placed in conduits—typically the bin—that connect it to the waste stream. Crucially, it is suggested that food is a specific genre of material culture and that this underpins the normativity of its binning alongside the attendant prevention of its recirculation or recovery. To conclude, I reflect on the broader implications of this analysis for understandings of consumption, disposal, and waste.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In some families, a 'maturation time' diminished the guilt that occurred when an edible food was discarded.
“In some families, we identified a 'maturation time' that diminished the guilt that occurred when an edible food was discarded, an aspect also noted by Evans (2012).”
From Food waste paradox: antecedents of food disposal in low income households (2015) · cites this paper as Evans, 2012
Cites
Evans, D. (2012) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038511416150 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Self-citationThe sacrifice of re-use: the travels of leftovers and family relations
Cappellini, B. (2009) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.299 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste
Papargyropoulou, E., Lozano, R., K. Steinberger, J., Wright, N., & Ujang, Z. B. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.020 · Cited by 1,711 · see citing works
Schanes, K., Dobernig, K., & Gözet, B. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.030 · Cited by 1,365 · see citing works
“decisive role in food provisioning but also in food waste generation (e.g. Wahlen, 2011, 2016; Evans, 2012).”
BackgroundHousehold food waste: drivers and potential intervention points for design – an extensive review
Hebrok, M., & Boks, C. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.069 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
Food waste paradox: antecedents of food disposal in low income households
Porpino, G., Parente, J., & Wansink, B. (2015) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12207 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Brennan, L., Langley, S., Verghese, K., Lockrey, S., Ryder, M., Francis, C., Phan-Le, N. T., & Hill, A. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125276 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Household food waste behavior: Avenues for future research
Porpino, G. (2016) · Journal of the Association for Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/684528 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
From Waste to Resource: The Trade in Wastes and Global Recycling Economies
Gregson, N., & Crang, M. (2015) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021105 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Food waste and domestic refrigeration: a visceral and material approach
Waitt, G., & Phillips, C. (2016) · Social & Cultural Geography · doi:10.1080/14649365.2015.1075580 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
A Brief Pre-History of Food Waste and the Social Sciences
Evans, D., Campbell, H., & Murcott, A. (2012) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/1467-954x.12035 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citationRispo, A., Williams, I. D., & Shaw, P. J. (2015) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.04.010 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- Evans, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Evans, David
- ORCID
- Evans, David
- Venue
- Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-01-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1123-1137
- ISSN
- 0263-7758 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3433
- OpenAlex
- W2053141095
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 10.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environment and Planning D Society and Space (publishedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
- Keywords
- food surplus, food waste, household food consumption, food disposal, gift-giving, food recovery, food circulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review