The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Remembering the Technological Unconscious by Foregrounding Knowledges of Position
Abstract
In this paper I provide a description and preliminary analysis of the current ‘technological unconscious’. I use this term to signify the basic forms of positioning and juxtapositioning which make up the basic ‘atomic structure’ of contemporary Euro-American life. Because of the potential vastness of the topic, I concentrate on just one form of positioning and juxtapositioning, namely the construction of repetition. The paper is in three parts. The first part provides a capsule history of how a very few templates of position and juxtaposition have become powered up into a capacious and effective background. In the second part of the paper I argue that in recent years the practice of these templates has been changing as a full-blown standardisation of space has taken hold. This standardisation is gradually leading to the crystallisation of a new kind of technological unconscious. In the third part of the paper I argue that the traces of this new kind of unconscious are taking hold in social theory as well, leading to the assumption of a quite different event horizon which can be thought of as a different kind of materiality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction
Dourish, P. (2001) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7221.001.0001 · Cited by 1,866 · cited 1×
“…capacities of communication, memory, and collaborative reach in particular ways that privilege a roving, engaged interaction as typical of ‘human’ cognition and feed that conception back into the informational devices and environments that increasingly surround us (Dourish, 2001; Goffey, 2002).”
Background
Cited by
Peripheral Vision: Economic Markets as Calculative Collective Devices
Callon, M., & Muniesa, F. (2005) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840605056393 · Cited by 1,378
Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life
Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001 · Cited by 964
Digital Wellbeing as a Dynamic Construct
Vanden Abeele, M. M. P. (2021) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtaa024 · Cited by 516
Graham, S. D. N. (2005) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/0309132505ph568oa · Cited by 489
Algorithmic War: Everyday Geographies of the War on Terror
Amoore, L. (2009) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00655.x · Cited by 410
Are social networks technologically embedded?
Licoppe, C., & Smoreda, Z. (2005) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.001 · Cited by 332
The matter of ‘virtual’ geographies
Kinsley, S. (2014) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132513506270 · Cited by 313
Media, Memory, Metaphor: Remembering and the Connective Turn
Hoskins, A. (2011) · Parallax · doi:10.1080/13534645.2011.605573 · Cited by 297
Data Matter(s): Legitimacy, Coding, and Qualifications-of-Life
Wilson, M. W. (2011) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d7910 · Cited by 79
Rethinking how Technologies Harm
Wood, M. A. (2021) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azaa074 · Cited by 60
Digital Media and the Precarity of Memory
Hoskins, A. (2017) · Collaborative Remembering · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198737865.003.0021 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Thrift, N.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 175-190
- ISSN
- 0263-7758 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3433
- OpenAlex
- W2062846888
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 94.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.