Cited by 40Motor Control and AdaptationVisual perception and processing mechanismsMultisensory perception and integration

Visual Stimulation Affects the Perception of Voluntary Leg Movements during Walking

Lackner, James R, DiZio, Paul·1988·Perception

Abstract

When a limb is used for locomotion, patterns of afferent and efferent activity related to its own motion are present as well as visual, vestibular, and other proprioceptive information about motion of the whole body. A study is reported in which it was asked whether visual stimulation present during whole-body motion can influence the perception of the leg movements propelling the body. Subjects were tested in conditions in which the stepping movements they made were identical but the amount of body displacement relative to inertial space and to the visual surround varied. These test conditions were created by getting the subjects to walk on a rotatable platform centered inside a large, independently rotatable, optokinetic drum. In each test condition, subjects, without looking at their legs, compared, against a standard condition in which the floor and drum were both stationary, their speed of body motion, their stride length and stepping rate, the direction of their steps, and the perceived force they exerted during stepping. When visual surround motion was incompatible with the motion normally associated with the stepping movements being made, changes in apparent body motion and in the awareness of the frequency, extent, and direction of the voluntary stepping movements resulted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1068/p170071

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If the subject is walking forward on a rotary treadmill moving in the same direction and at the same rate as the surrounding drum, no motion sickness will result.

    “By contrast, if the subject is walking forward on a rotary treadmill moving in the same direction and at the same rate as the surrounding drum, no motion sickness will result (Lackner and DiZio 1988).”

    From Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting (2014) · cites this paper as Lackner and DiZio 1988

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lackner, J. R., & DiZio, P.
Affiliations
Brandeis University (US)
Venue
Perception
Published
1988-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
71-80
ISSN
  • 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4233
OpenAlex
W2030028686
Cited by
40
References
13
Citations by year
2023: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perception (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
visual stimulation, walking, stepping, visual-vestibular interaction, optokinetic drum, stride length, stepping rate, proprioception, locomotion
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Postural Balance, Gait, Humans, Kinesthesis, Locomotion, Motion Perception, Orientation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review