The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational and Performance Aspects of PCA-Based Face-Recognition Algorithms
Abstract
Algorithms based on principal component analysis (PCA) form the basis of numerous studies in the psychological and algorithmic face-recognition literature. PCA is a statistical technique and its incorporation into a face-recognition algorithm requires numerous design decisions. We explicitly state the design decisions by introducing a generic modular PCA-algorithm. This allows us to investigate these decisions, including those not documented in the literature. We experimented with different implementations of each module, and evaluated the different implementations using the September 1996 FERET evaluation protocol (the de facto standard for evaluating face-recognition algorithms). We experimented with (i) changing the illumination normalization procedure; (ii) studying effects on algorithm performance of compressing images with JPEG and wavelet compression algorithms; (iii) varying the number of eigenvectors in the representation; and (iv) changing the similarity measure in the classification process. We performed two experiments. In the first experiment, we obtained performance results on the standard September 1996 FERET large-gallery image sets. In the second experiment, we examined the variability in algorithm performance on different sets of facial images. The study was performed on 100 randomly generated image sets (galleries) of the same size. Our two most significant results are (i) changing the similarity measure produced the greatest change in performance, and (ii) that difference in performance of ±10% is needed to distinguish between algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71 · Cited by 13,733
Cited by
FMCNet: Feature-Level Modality Compensation for Visible-Infrared Person Re-Identification
Zhang, Q., Lai, C., Liu, J., Huang, N., & Han, J. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00720 · Cited by 279
Gait-based Person Re-identification: A Survey
Nambiar, A., Bernardino, A., & Nascimento, J. C. (2020) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3243043 · Cited by 96
Seeing infrastructure: race, facial recognition and the politics of data
Stevens, N., & Keyes, O. (2021) · Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/09502386.2021.1895252 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Moon, H., & Phillips, P. J.
- Venue
- Perception
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 303-321
- ISSN
- 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4233
- OpenAlex
- W2102773363
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational and Performance Aspects of PCA-Based Face-Recognition Algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/p2896
- The paper
- Moon, H., & Phillips, P. J. (2001). Computational and Performance Aspects of PCA-Based Face-Recognition Algorithms. Perception. https://doi.org/10.1068/p2896
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.