The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Representation of the Gender of Human Faces by Infants: A Preference for Female
Abstract
Six experiments based on visual preference procedures were conducted to examine gender categorization of female versus male faces by infants aged 3 to 4 months. In experiment 1, infants familiarized with male faces preferred a female face over a novel male face, but infants familiarized with female faces divided their attention between a male face and a novel female face. Experiment 2 demonstrated that these asymmetrical categorization results were likely due to a spontaneous preference for females. Experiments 3 and 4 showed that the preference for females was based on processing of the internal facial features in their upright orientation, and not the result of external hair cues or higher-contrast internal facial features. While experiments 1 through 4 were conducted with infants reared with female primary caregivers, experiment 5 provided evidence that infants reared with male primary caregivers tend to show a spontaneous preference for males. Experiment 6 showed that infants reared with female primary caregivers displayed recognition memory for individual females, but not males. These results suggest that representation of information about human faces by young infants may be influenced by the gender of the primary caregiver.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence for a Global Categorical Representation of Humans by Young Infants
Quinn, P. C., & Eimas, P. D. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1006/jecp.1998.2443 · Cited by 103
Self-citation
Cited by
Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00569.x · Cited by 1,089
Patterns of gender development
Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. N. (2010) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100511 · Cited by 600
Interpersonal synchrony increases prosocial behavior in infants
Cirelli, L. K., Einarson, K. M., & Trainor, L. J. (2014) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12193 · Cited by 565
Three‐month‐olds show a negativity bias in their social evaluations
Kiley Hamlin, J., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2010) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00951.x · Cited by 494
A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice
Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2006) · Advances in Child Development and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-2407(06)80004-2 · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Authors
- Quinn, P. C., Yahr, J., Kuhn, A., Slater, A. M., & Pascalis, O.
- Venue
- Perception
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1109-1121
- ISSN
- 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4233
- OpenAlex
- W2169190432
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Representation of the Gender of Human Faces by Infants: A Preference for Female. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/p3331
- The paper
- Quinn, P. C., Yahr, J., Kuhn, A., Slater, A. M., & Pascalis, O. (2002). Representation of the Gender of Human Faces by Infants: A Preference for Female. Perception. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3331
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.