Cited by 565Action Observation and SynchronizationNeuroscience and Music PerceptionChild and Animal Learning Development

Interpersonal synchrony increases prosocial behavior in infants

Open access
Cirelli, Laura K., Einarson, Kathleen M., Trainor, Laurel J.·2014·Developmental Science

Abstract

Adults who move together to a shared musical beat synchronously as opposed to asynchronously are subsequently more likely to display prosocial behaviors toward each other. The development of musical behaviors during infancy has been described previously, but the social implications of such behaviors in infancy have been little studied. In Experiment 1, each of 48 14‐month‐old infants was held by an assistant and gently bounced to music while facing the experimenter, who bounced either in‐synchrony or out‐of‐synchrony with the way the infant was bounced. The infants were then placed in a situation in which they had the opportunity to help the experimenter by handing objects to her that she had ‘accidently’ dropped. We found that 14‐month‐old infants were more likely to engage in altruistic behavior and help the experimenter after having been bounced to music in synchrony with her, compared to infants who were bounced to music asynchronously with her. The results of Experiment 2, using anti‐phase bouncing, suggest that this is due to the contingency of the synchronous movements as opposed to movement symmetry. These findings support the hypothesis that interpersonal motor synchrony might be one key component of musical engagement that encourages social bonds among group members, and suggest that this motor synchrony to music may promote the very early development of altruistic behavior. A video abstract of this article can be viewed at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IaqWehfDm7c&feature=youtu.be

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/desc.12193

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 14-month-old infants, synchronous bouncing while listening to music increased prosocial and altruistic behavior compared to asynchronous or no bouncing.

    “In this study, 14-mo-old infants who were bounced synchronously while listening to music were more likely to exhibit prosocial and altruistic behavior compared to infants who were bounced asynchronously or were not bounced at all [123].”

    From Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond. (2018) · cites this paper as [123]

    The paper reports greater spontaneous helping after synchronous than asynchronous bouncing, and its Discussion describes the helping as an early form of altruism. But the listed experimental conditions all involved bouncing; our copy does not support the claimed comparison with infants who were not bounced. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Synchronous activity increases subsequent prosocial behaviour and feelings of affiliation.

    “In addition to the apparent endorphin effect, an expanding body of the literature has consistently shown that synchronous activity increases subsequent prosocial behaviour and feelings of affiliation (e.g. [37–45]).”

    From The ice-breaker effect: Singing mediates fast social bonding (2015) · cites this paper as [38]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [34]34. Thomas, K. (2007). Just noticeable difference and tempo change. Journal of Scientific Psychology, 5, 14-20.
  2. [35]35. Toiviainen, P., Burger, B. (2013). MoCap Toolbox -A Matlab toolbox for computational analysis of movement data. In R. Bresin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th Sound and Music Computing Conference. Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
  3. [46]46. Woolhouse, M., & Tidhar, D. (2010). Group dancing leads to increased person-percetion. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, 605-608.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cirelli, L. K., Einarson, K. M., & Trainor, L. J.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Baycrest Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Trainor, Laurel J.
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06-12
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
1003-1011
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
OpenAlex
W2157639324
Cited by
565
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
45.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (197033-2009)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
interpersonal synchrony, prosocial behavior, altruism, infant development, social bonding, helping behavior, music engagement
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Analysis of Variance, Auditory Perception, Female, Humans, Infant, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Movement, Social Behavior, Statistics as Topic, Infant Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review