The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Common Oscillator for Perceptual Rivalries?
Abstract
Perceptual rivalry is an oscillation of conscious experience that takes place despite univarying, if ambiguous, sensory input. Much current interest is focused on the controversy over the neural site of binocular rivalry, a variety of perceptual rivalry for which a number of different cortical regions have been implicated. Debate continues over the relative role of higher levels of processing compared with primary visual cortex and the suggestion that different forms of rivalry involve different cortical areas. Here we show that the temporal pattern of disappearance and reappearance in motion-induced blindness (MIB) (Bonneh et al, 2001 Nature411 798–801) is highly correlated with the pattern of oscillation reported during binocular rivalry in the same individual. This correlation holds over a wide range of inter-individual variation. Temporal similarity in the two phenomena was strikingly confirmed by the effects of the hallucinogen LSD, which produced the same, extraordinary, pattern of increased rhythmicity in both kinds of perceptual oscillation. Furthermore, MIB demonstrates the two properties previously considered characteristic of binocular rivalry. Namely the distribution of dominance periods can be approximated by a gamma distribution and, in line with Levelt's second proposition of binocular rivalry, predominance of one perceptual phase can be increased through a reduction in the predominance time of the opposing phase. We conclude that (i) MIB is a form of perceptual rivalry, and (ii) there may be a common oscillator responsible for timing aspects of all forms of perceptual rivalry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?
Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380621a0 · Cited by 560
Single units and conscious vision
The American Association for Research into Nervous and Mental Diseases, & Logothetis, N. K. (1998) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0333 · Cited by 375
Motion-induced blindness in normal observers
Bonneh, Y. S., Cooperman, A., & Sagi, D. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35081073 · Cited by 299
Cited by
Nichols, D. E. (2004) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2003.11.002 · Cited by 1,211
Psychophysical magic: rendering the visible ‘invisible’
Kim, C.-Y., & Blake, R. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.06.012 · Cited by 451
Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry
Einhäuser, W., Stout, J., Koch, C., & Carter, O. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707727105 · Cited by 351
Self-citationPressnitzer, D., & Hupé, J.-M. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.054 · Cited by 302
Meditation alters perceptual rivalry in Tibetan Buddhist monks
Carter, O. L., Presti, D. E., Callistemon, C., Ungerer, Y., Liu, G. B., & Pettigrew, J. D. (2005) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.043 · Cited by 262
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Carter, O. L., & Pettigrew, J. D.
- Venue
- Perception
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295-305
- ISSN
- 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4233
- OpenAlex
- W2146590513
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Common Oscillator for Perceptual Rivalries? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1068/p3472
- The paper
- Carter, O. L., & Pettigrew, J. D. (2003). A Common Oscillator for Perceptual Rivalries? Perception. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3472
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.