Cited by 262Visual perception and processing mechanismsPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Meditation alters perceptual rivalry in Tibetan Buddhist monks

Open access
Carter, O.L., Presti, D.E., Callistemon, C., Ungerer, Y., Liu, G.B., Pettigrew, J.D.·2005·Current Biology

Abstract

Neuroscientific studies of the mind are likely to benefit from the insights and skills of Tibetan Buddhist monks who have practiced the historic tradition of meditative training over many years — a point made recently at a forum between a selection of Buddhist leaders and distinguished scientists [1]. Perceptual rivalries, such as binocular rivalry [2] and motion induced blindness [3], are being used to study the neural mechanisms underlying consciousness and attention [2,4], as they involve fluctuations in conscious awareness despite unchanging external stimulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.043

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have previously reported meditation-induced long-term changes in attentional processing.

    “Besides observing unique changes, which existed during meditation, several studies have previously reported meditation induced long-term changes in brain structure (Lazar et al. 2005), attentional processing (Carter et al. 2005), and emotional processing (Goldin and Gross 2010).”

    From Brain–Heart Interactions Underlying Traditional Tibetan Buddhist Meditation (2019) · cites this paper as Carter et al. 2005

  • Mindfulness-based approaches have been shown to be effective in managing stress, anxiety, depression, and chronic pain.

    “mindfulness-based approaches have been shown to be effective in managing conditions such as stress, anxiety, depression, and chronic pain.”
  • MBSR has demonstrated significant benefits in stress, anxiety, depression, and chronic pain and is recommended in several guidelines.

    “the extensively researched MBSR program, has demonstrated significant benefits in these areas [16–23], and are recommended in several guidelines [22, 24, 25].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carter, O. L., Presti, D. E., Callistemon, C., Ungerer, Y., Liu, G. B., & Pettigrew, J. D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
  • Carter, O.L.
  • Pettigrew, J.D.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
15
Issue
11
Pages
R412-R413
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003131878
Cited by
262
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Heffter Research Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
meditation, perceptual rivalry, Tibetan Buddhist monks, binocular rivalry, motion-induced blindness, consciousness, attention
MeSH terms
Attention, Buddhism, Clergy, Consciousness, Humans, India, Motion Perception, Visual Perception, Vision, Binocular, Vision Disparity, Tibet, Meditation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review