Cited by 31Visual perception and processing mechanismsArchitecture and Art History StudiesAesthetic Perception and Analysis

Visual Rays are Parallel

Koenderink, Jan, van Doorn, Andrea, de Ridder, Huib, Oomes, Stijn·2010·Perception

Abstract

We show that human observers using monocular viewing treat the pencil of 'visual rays' that diverges from the vantage point as experientally parallel. This oddity becomes very noticeable in the case of wide-angle presentations, where the angle subtended by a pair of visual rays may be as large as the angular size of the display. In our presentations such angles subtended over 100 deg. There are various ways to demonstrate the effect; in this study we measure the attitudes of pictorial objects that appear to be situated in mutually parallel attitudes in pictorial space. Our finding is that such objects appear parallel if they are similarly oriented with respect to the local visual rays. This leads to 'errors' in the judgment of mutual orientations of up to 100 deg. Although this appears to be the first quantitative study of the effect, we trace it to qualitative reports by Helmholtz (late 19th century) and Kepler (early 17th century) as well as speculation by early authors (AD 500). The effect has apparently been noticed by visual artists from the late middle ages to the present day.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1068/p6530

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even at close distances, perceptions differ from careful measurements.

    “Even at close distances our perceptions differ from our careful measurements (Kappers 1999;Cuijpers et al. 2003;Koenderink et al. 2010;Pont et al. 2012)”

    From The Interface Theory of Perception (2015) · cites this paper as Koenderink et al. 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koenderink, J., van Doorn, A., de Ridder, H., & Oomes, S.
Affiliations
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Industrial Design, Landbergstraat 15, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Koenderink, Jan
Venue
Perception
Published
2010-01-01
Volume
39
Issue
9
Pages
1163-1171
ISSN
  • 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4233
OpenAlex
W1990282947
Cited by
31
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perception (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Architecture and Art History Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Keywords
monocular viewing, pictorial space, orientation judgment, Helmholtz, Kepler, visual artists
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Illusions, Male, Photic Stimulation, Space Perception, Visual Perception, Vision, Monocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review