Ruminal acetogens and their potential to lower ruminant methane emissions.
Abstract
Ruminant methane is a major contributor to the anthropogenic greenhouse gas inventories of Australia and New Zealand. Direct intervention in the rumen offers one means for controlling ruminant methane emissions. In this respect, acetogenic bacteria (acetogens) normally present in the rumen are of interest because they have the potential to provide an alternative sink for H2, an essential intermediate in the formation of methane. Although little is known about the populations of acetogens in grazing ruminants, studies on ruminants fed diets containing concentrates or conserved forages indicate that the rumen contains a diversity of acetogens and that some of these have the potential to act as hydrogenotrophs in place of methanogens. This paper describes the current understanding of ruminal acetogens and outlines potential applications of acetogens in methane mitigation strategies. Strategies which use acetogens to outcompete and displace methanogens are considered less likely to be successful than strategies which use acetogens to maintain low H2 levels in the rumen following suppression of methanogens. However, the former cannot be completely discounted at present.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hydrogenotrophic methanogens are thermodynamically favored over acetogens when competing for hydrogen in the rumen.
“Furthermore, hydrogenotrophic methanogens are thermodynamic favored than acetogens when competing for hydrogen in rumen (Cord-Ruwisch et al., 1988; Joblin, 1999)”
From Comparative Analysis of the Microbiota Between Sheep Rumen and Rabbit Cecum Provides New Insight Into Their Differential Methane Production (2018) · cites this paper as Joblin, 1999
Cites
Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria
Thauer, R. K., Jungermann, K., & Decker, K. (1977) · Bacteriological Reviews · doi:10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977 · Cited by 4,146 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Manipulation of rumen fermentation and methane production with plant secondary metabolites
Bodas, R., Prieto, N., García-González, R., Andrés, S., Giráldez, F. J., & López, S. (2012) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.07.010 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Bhatta, R., Uyeno, Y., Tajima, K., Takenaka, A., Yabumoto, Y., Nonaka, I., Enishi, O., & Kurihara, M. (2009) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1441 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
New aspects and strategies for methane mitigation from ruminants
Kumar, S., Choudhury, P. K., Carro, M. D., Griffith, G. W., Dagar, S. S., Puniya, M., Calabro, S., Ravella, S. R., Dhewa, T., Upadhyay, R. C., et al. (2014) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-013-5365-0 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
A theoretical comparison between two ruminal electron sinks
Ungerfeld, E. M. (2013) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00319 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Martinez-Fernandez, G., Denman, S. E., Cheung, J., & McSweeney, C. S. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01871 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Mi, L., Yang, B., Hu, X., Luo, Y., Liu, J., Yu, Z., & Wang, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00575 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
- Authors
- Joblin, K. N.
- Affiliations
- Crown Research Institutes (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Joblin, K. N.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1999-10-15
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1307-1314
- ISSN
- 0004-9409 (ISSN-L)
- 1444-9838
- OpenAlex
- W2099951728
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian Journal of Agricultural Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Agricultural and Marketing Research and Development Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Keywords
- ruminant methane emissions, methane mitigation, methanogenic archaea, hydrogen sink, rumen microbiota, greenhouse gas emissions, grazing ruminants, concentrate supplementation, conserved forage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review