The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Water Relations of Staphylococcus Aureus At 30°C
Open accessAbstract
Fourteen food-poisoning strains of Staphylococcus aureus have been grown in various media of known water activity at 30°C. Aerobic growth was observed atwater activities between 0.999 and 0.86. The rate of growth and the yield of cells were both reduced substantially when the water activity was less than c. 0.94. The lower limits for growth in dried meat, dried milk, and dried soup were similar to those in liquid media. Aerobic growth proceeded at slightly lower water activities than anaerobic growth. All cells were capable of forming colonies on agar media with water activities as low as 0.92. The 14 strains proved to be a homogeneous group with similar water equirements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Potential and actual uses of zeolites in crop protection
De Smedt, C., Someus, E., & Spanoghe, P. (2015) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.3999 · Cited by 98
Water Activity in Cheese in Relation to Composition, Stability and Safety
Marcos, A. (1993) · Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2650-6_11 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott, W.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1953-12-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 549-564
- ISSN
- 0004-9417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2178682063
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
