The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving salt tolerance of wheat and barley: future prospects
Open accessAbstract
Cropping on saline land is restricted by the low tolerance of crops to salinity and waterlogging. Prospects for improving salt tolerance in wheat and barley include the use of: (i) intra-specific variation, (ii) variation for salt tolerance in the progenitors of these cereals, (iii) wide-hybridisation with halophytic ‘wild’ relatives (an option for wheat, but not barley), and (iv) transgenic techniques. In this review, key traits contributing to salt tolerance, and sources of variation for these within the Triticeae, are identified and recommendations for use of these traits in screening for salt tolerance are summarised. The potential of the approaches to deliver substantial improvements in salt tolerance is discussed, and the importance of adverse interactions between waterlogging and salinity are emphasised. The potential to develop new crops from the diverse halophytic flora is also considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crop Salt Tolerance—Current Assessment
Maas, E. V., & Hoffman, G. J. (1977) · Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division · doi:10.1061/jrcea4.0001137 · Cited by 3,565
The Mechanism of Salt Tolerance in Halophytes
Flowers, T. J., Troke, P. F., & Yeo, A. R. (1977) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.28.060177.000513 · Cited by 1,942
Self-citationTrehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses
Garg, A. K., Kim, J.-K., Owens, T. G., Ranwala, A. P., Choi, Y. D., Kochian, L. V., & Wu, R. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.252637799 · Cited by 1,346
Review of prospects for germplasm improvement for waterlogging tolerance in wheat, barley and oats
Setter, T. L., & Waters, I. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1024573305997 · Cited by 612
An examination of selection criteria for salt tolerance in wheat, barley and triticale genotypes
Rawson, H., Richards, R., & Munns, R. (1988) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/ar9880759 · Cited by 144
Self-citation
Cited by
Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance
Munns, R., & Tester, M. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 · Cited by 13,792
Self-citationSalinity tolerance in halophytes*
Flowers, T. J., & Colmer, T. D. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x · Cited by 2,789
Self-citationJames, R. A., Blake, C., Byrt, C. S., & Munns, R. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err003 · Cited by 490
Self-citationTang, X., Mu, X., Shao, H., Wang, H., & Brestic, M. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.3109/07388551.2014.889080 · Cited by 366
Over‐expression of an Na + ‐ and K + ‐permeable HKT transporter in barley improves salt tolerance
Mian, A., Oomen, R. J. F. J., Isayenkov, S., Sentenac, H., Maathuis, F. J. M., & Véry, A. (2011) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04701.x · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Colmer, T. D., Munns, R., & Flowers, T. J.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1425
- ISSN
- 0816-1089 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986744645
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving salt tolerance of wheat and barley: future prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/ea04162
- The paper
- Colmer, T. D., Munns, R., & Flowers, T. J. (2005). Improving salt tolerance of wheat and barley: future prospects. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1071/ea04162
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
