The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aquatic Colloids and Nanoparticles: Current Knowledge and Future Trends
Abstract
Environmental Context. The fate and behaviour of trace pollutants are very strongly modified, and usually dominated, by their physical and chemical interactions with naturally occurring aquatic colloids (defined as solid phase material with one dimension between 1 nm and 1 µm). This review summarises the area and key advances in the field of natural aquatic colloids, including technique development and quantification of colloidal structure and interactions with pollutants. The review also discusses areas in which significant advances are likely to be made or are needed and, as such, provides a framework for further work in the next few years. Abstract. Natural aquatic colloids are materials with one dimension between 1 nm and 1 µm. More informally defined, nanoparticles are materials with at least one dimension less than 100 nm. Both colloids and nanoparticles have significant effects on pollutant, nutrient, and pathogen chemistry, transport and bioavailability, and may themselves be bioavailable. Techniques for their fractionation, characterization and analysis have improved greatly in recent years. Although knowledge of their structure and environmental impact has also increased, it has not done so to the same degree and thus the field awaits the substantial application of new methodologies. This paper reviews the current state of the art in this area and also discusses likely future developments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanoscale iron particles for environmental remediation: An overview
Zhang, W.-X. (2003) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1023/a:1025520116015 · Cited by 2,003
Molecular structure in soil humic substances: the new view
Sutton, R., & Sposito, G. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es050778q · Cited by 1,316
Manceau, A., Marcus, M. A., Tamura, N., Proux, O., Geoffroy, N., & Lanson, B. (2004) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2003.11.021 · Cited by 184
Cited by
Fluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems: A review
Henderson, R. K., Baker, A., Murphy, K. R., Hambly, A., Stuetz, R. M., & Khan, S. J. (2009) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.027 · Cited by 990
The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles
Handy, R. D., von der Kammer, F., Lead, J. R., Hassellöv, M., Owen, R., & Crane, M. (2008) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1007/s10646-008-0199-8 · Cited by 916
Self-citationFrom ecotoxicology to nanoecotoxicology
Kahru, A., & Dubourguier, H.-C. (2010) · Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.tox.2009.08.016 · Cited by 788
Trace elements in speleothems as recorders of environmental change
Fairchild, I. J., & Treble, P. C. (2009) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2008.11.007 · Cited by 593
Nanoadsorbents: Classification, Preparation, and Applications (with Emphasis on Aqueous Media)
Khajeh, M., Laurent, S., & Dastafkan, K. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400086v · Cited by 528
Metadata
- Authors
- Lead, J. R., & Wilkinson, K. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Chemistry
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2006-07-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 159-171
- ISSN
- 1448-2517 (ISSN-L)
- 1449-8979
- OpenAlex
- W1974670319
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 32.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aquatic Colloids and Nanoparticles: Current Knowledge and Future Trends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/en06025
- The paper
- Lead, J. R., & Wilkinson, K. J. (2006). Aquatic Colloids and Nanoparticles: Current Knowledge and Future Trends. Environmental Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1071/en06025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.