The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems: A review
Open accessAbstract
A rapid, highly sensitive and selective detector is urgently required to detect contamination events in recycled water systems - for example, cross-connection events in dual reticulation pipes that recycle advanced treated sewage effluent - as existing technologies, including total organic carbon and conductivity monitoring, cannot always provide the sensitivity required. Fluorescence spectroscopy has been suggested as a potential monitoring tool given its high sensitivity and selectivity. A review of recent literature demonstrates that by monitoring the fluorescence of dissolved organic matter (DOM), the ratios of humic-like (Peak C) and protein-like (Peak T) fluorescence peaks can be used to identify trace sewage contamination in river waters and estuaries, a situation analogous to contamination detection in recycled water systems. Additionally, strong correlations have been shown between Peak T and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in rivers, which is indicative of water impacted by microbial activity and therefore of sewage impacted systems. Hence, this review concludes that the sensitive detection of contamination events in recycled water systems may be achieved by monitoring Peak T and/or Peak C fluorescence. However, in such systems, effluent is treated to a high standard resulting in much lower DOM concentrations and the impact of these advanced treatment processes on Peaks T and C fluorescence is largely unknown and requires investigation. This review has highlighted that further work is also required to determine (a) the stability and distinctiveness of recycled water fluorescence in relation to the treatment processes utilised, (b) the impact of matrix effects, particularly the impact of oxidation, (c) calibration issues for online monitoring, and (d) the advanced data analytical techniques required, if any, to improve detection of contamination events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy
Lakowicz, J. R. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3061-6 · Cited by 26,947
Wastewater engineering : treatment and reuse
Metcalf, & Eddy (2004) · McGraw-Hill eBooks · Cited by 9,028
Chen, W., Westerhoff, P., Leenheer, J. A., & Booksh, K. (2003) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es034354c · Cited by 6,319
Environmental Chemistry of Soils
McBride, M. B. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,997
Coble, P. G. (1996) · Marine Chemistry · doi:10.1016/0304-4203(95)00062-3 · Cited by 3,634
McKnight, D. M., Boyer, E. W., Westerhoff, P. K., Doran, P. T., Kulbe, T., & Andersen, D. T. (2001) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.2001.46.1.0038 · Cited by 3,112
PARAFAC. Tutorial and applications
Bro, R. (1997) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7439(97)00032-4 · Cited by 2,814
Anderson, E. N. (1977) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 2,567
Fundamentals of analytical chemistry
Skoog, D. A. (1963) · Cited by 2,234
Stedmon, C. A., Markager, S., & Bro, R. (2003) · Marine Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0304-4203(03)00072-0 · Cited by 2,019
Cited by
Fate of antibiotics during municipal water recycling treatment processes
Le-Minh, N., Khan, S. J., Drewes, J. E., & Stuetz, R. M. (2010) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.06.020 · Cited by 778
Self-citationEnhanced technology based for sewage sludge deep dewatering: A critical review
Cao, B., Zhang, T., Zhang, W., & Wang, D. (2021) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.116650 · Cited by 486
Controls of dissolved organic matter quality: evidence from a large‐scale boreal lake survey
Kothawala, D. N., Stedmon, C. A., Müller, R. A., Weyhenmeyer, G. A., Köhler, S. J., & Tranvik, L. J. (2014) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12488 · Cited by 396
Advances in on-line drinking water quality monitoring and early warning systems
Storey, M. V., van der Gaag, B., & Burns, B. P. (2011) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.049 · Cited by 375
Bioreactor monitoring with spectroscopy and chemometrics: a review
Lourenço, N. D., Lopes, J. A., Almeida, C. F., Sarraguça, M. C., & Pinheiro, H. M. (2012) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-012-6073-9 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Henderson, R. K., Baker, A., Murphy, K. R., Hambly, A., Stuetz, R. M., & Khan, S. J.
- Venue
- Water Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 863-881
- ISSN
- 0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025721714
- Cited by
- 990
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 56.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.027
- The paper
- Henderson, R. K., Baker, A., Murphy, K. R., Hambly, A., Stuetz, R. M., & Khan, S. J. (2009). Fluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems: A review. Water Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.