Cited by 51Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Addressing patient alcohol use: a view from general practice

Open access
Mules, Thomas, Taylor, Jennifer, Price, Rachel, Walker, Logan, Singh, Baneet, Newsam, Patrick, Palaniyappan, Thenmoli, Snook, Toby +8 more·2012·The Journal of Primary Health Care

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: General practitioners (GPs) have the potential to promote alcohol harm minimisation via discussion of alcohol use with patients, but knowledge of GPs' current practice and attitudes on this matter is limited. Our aim was to assess GPs' current practice and attitudes towards discussing alcohol use with their patients. METHODS: This qualitative study involved semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with 19 GPs by a group of medical students in primary care practices in Wellington, New Zealand. FINDINGS: Despite agreement amongst GPs about the importance of their role in alcohol harm minimisation, alcohol was not often raised in patient consultations. GPs' usual practice included referral to drug and alcohol services and advice. GPs were also aware of national drinking guidelines and alcohol screening tools, but in practice these were rarely utilised. Key barriers to discussing alcohol use included its societal 'taboo' nature, time constraints, and perceptions of patient dishonesty. CONCLUSION: In this study there is a fundamental mismatch between the health community's expectations of GPs to discuss alcohol with patients and the reality. Potential solutions to the most commonly identified barriers include screening outside the GP consultation, incorporating screening tools into existing software used by GPs, exploring with GPs the social stigma associated with alcohol misuse, and framing alcohol misuse as a health issue. As it is unclear if these approaches will change GP practice, there remains scope for the development and pilot testing of potential solutions identified in this research, together with an assessment of their efficacy in reducing hazardous alcohol consumption.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/hc12217

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mules, T., Taylor, J., Price, R., Walker, L., Singh, B., Newsam, P., Palaniyappan, T., Snook, T., Ruselan, M., Ryan, J., Santhirasegaran, J., Shearman, P., Watson, P., Zino, R., Signal, L., & Fouge, G.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Signal, Louise
Venue
The Journal of Primary Health Care
Published
2012-09-01
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
217-222
ISSN
1172-6156 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125135339
Cited by
51
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Primary Health Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
alcohol consumption, general practitioners, alcohol screening, barriers to discussion, social stigma, hazardous drinking, primary care
MeSH terms
Alcoholism, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, New Zealand, Physician-Patient Relations, Practice Patterns, Physicians', General Practitioners, General Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review