Cited by 11Health Policy Implementation ScienceSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and Interventions

Implementing alcohol screening and brief interventions in primary health care: study protocol for a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial

Open access
Rosário, Frederico, Vasiljevic, Milica, Pas, Leo, Fitzgerald, Niamh, Ribeiro, Cristina·2019·Family Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alcohol is one of the most important risk factors contributing to the global burden of disease. Screening and brief interventions in primary care settings are effective in reducing alcohol consumption. However, implementation of such interventions in routine practice has been proven difficult. Most programmes in practice and research have lacked a theoretical rationale for how they would change practitioner behaviour. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a theory-based behaviour change intervention delivered to primary care practices significantly increases delivery of alcohol screening. METHODS: We will conduct a two-arm, cluster-randomized controlled, parallel, open trial. Twelve primary care practices will be randomized to one of two groups: training and support; and waiting-list control. Family physicians, nurses and receptionists will be eligible to participate. The intervention will be a training and support programme. The intervention will be tailored to the barriers and facilitators for implementing alcohol screening and brief interventions following the principles of the Behaviour Change Wheel approach. The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients screened with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. CONCLUSION: This study will test whether a theory-driven implementation programme increases alcohol screening rates in primary care. Results from this trial will provide a useful addition to existing evidence by informing implementation researchers what areas of behaviour change are critical to increasing alcohol screening rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02968186.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/fampra/cmy062

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Emergency department- based brief interventions for individuals with substance-related problems: a review of effectiveness. EMCDDA Papers, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2016.
  2. ROSÁRIO F., SANTOS M., ANGUS K., PAS L., RIBEIRO C., FITZGERALD N. Factors influencing the implementation of early identification and brief interventions for alcohol use in primary health care practices: a systematic review, Manuscript in preparation.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosário, F., Vasiljevic, M., Pas, L., Fitzgerald, N., & Ribeiro, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of Stirling (GB)
Corresponding author
Rosário, Frederico
Venue
Family Practice
Published
2018-06-25
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
199-205
ISSN
  • 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2229
OpenAlex
W2810590781
Cited by
11
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Family Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
The Dão Lafões Grouping of Primary Health Care Centres
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
alcohol screening, brief intervention, primary care, implementation, Behaviour Change Wheel, theory-based intervention, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, general practitioners, nurses, receptionists, alcohol consumption
MeSH terms
Alcoholism, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Nurses, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Teaching, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Physicians, Primary Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review