Cited by 19Fire effects on ecosystemsSoil erosion and sediment transportSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics

Sediment aggregation and water quality in wildfire-affected river basins.

Blake, W. H., Wallbrink, P. J., Droppo, I. G.·2009·Marine and Freshwater Research

Abstract

Off-site transfer of nutrient-rich burnt soil has implications for downstream water quality. Coarsening of effective particle size (EPS) distributions in burnt material via aggregation of fines into composite particles modifies post-fire sediment and nutrient transport dynamics. Experiments were undertaken to establish temperature controls on wildfire-enhanced soil aggregation. Burnt and unburnt soil from a temperate eucalypt forest were analysed for EPS and settling velocity using a LISST-ST (Laser In Situ Scatter and Transmissometry with Settling Tube) particle size analyser. Next, samples were burnt (250–550°C) before further analysis with the LISST-ST. Settling velocities of naturally burnt soil aggregates were greater than unburnt aggregates of the same EPS. Experimental burning indicated that dense water-stable aggregates form at relatively low temperatures (250°C) probably due to distillation and carbonisation, through pyrolysis, of organic volatiles in surface litter. Under these conditions, the EPS distribution of burnt surface soil coarsens with up to 50% of the <63-µm fraction becoming aggregated. A positive relationship between ‘plant-available’ phosphorus and burn temperature was observed. Given that a large proportion of soil particulate phosphorus is associated with the <63-µm fraction, fire-related aggregation processes have potentially important implications for post-fire fine sediment and nutrient transport and storage dynamics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/mf08068

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blake, W. H., Wallbrink, P. J., & Droppo, I. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Blake, W. H.
Venue
Marine and Freshwater Research
Published
2009-07-28
Volume
60
Issue
7
Pages
653-659
ISSN
  • 1323-1650 (ISSN-L)
  • 1448-6059
OpenAlex
W1969550023
Cited by
19
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Marine and Freshwater Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Keywords
forest fires, soil aggregation, water quality, effective particle size, settling velocity, burned soil, nutrient transport, phosphorus, pyrolysis, eucalypt forest, fine sediment, post-fire runoff, burn temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review