Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 338

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evolution and diversity of CO 2 concentrating mechanisms in cyanobacteria

Open access
Badger, Murray R., Hanson, David, Price, G. Dean·2002·Australian Journal of Plant Physiology

Abstract

Cyanobacteria have developed an effective photosynthetic CO2 concentrating mechanism (CCM) for improving the efficiency of carboxylation by a relatively inefficient Rubisco. The development of this CCM was presumably in response to the decline in atmospheric CO2 levels and rising O2, both of which were triggered by the development of oxygenic photosynthesis by cyanobacteria themselves. In the past few years there has been a rapid expansion in our understanding of the mechanism and genes responsible for the CCM. In addition, there has been a recent expansion in the availability of complete cyanobacterial genomes, thus increasing our potential to examine questions regarding both the evolution and diversity of components of the CCM across cyanobacteria. This paper considers various CCM and photosynthesis gene components across eight cyanobacteria where significant genomic information is available. Significant conclusions from our analysis of the distribution of various genes indicated the following. Firstly, cyanobacteria have developed with two types of carboxysomes, and this is correlated with the form of Rubisco present. We have coined the terms α-cyanobacteria to refer to cyanobacteria containing Form 1A Rubisco and α-carboxysomes, and β-cyanobacteria having Form 1B Rubisco and β-carboxysomes. Secondly, there are two NDH-1 CO2 uptake systems distributed variably, with Prochlorococcus marinus species appearing to lack this CO2 uptake system. There are at least two HCO3– transport systems distributed variably, with some α-cyanobacteria having an absence of systems identified in β-cyanobacteria. Finally, there are multiple forms of carbonic anhydrases (CAs), but with only β-carboxysomal CA having a clearly shown role at present. The α-cyanobacteria appear to lack a clearly identifiable carboxysomal CA. A pathway for the evolution of cyanobacterial CCMs is proposed. The acquisition of carboxysomes triggered by the rapid decline of atmospheric CO2 in the Phanerozoic is argued to be the initial step. This would then be followed by the development of NDH-1 CO2-uptake systems, followed by the development of low-and high-affinity HCO3– transporters. An intriguing question is, were carboxysomes developed first in cyanobacteria, or did they originate by the lateral transfer of pre-existing proteobacterial bacterial microcompartment genes? The potentially late evolution of the CCM genes in cyanobacteria argues for a polyphyletic and separate evolution of CCMs in cyanobacteria, algae, and higher plants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/pp01213

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 338

Metadata

Authors
Badger, M. R., Hanson, D., & Price, G. D.
Venue
Australian Journal of Plant Physiology
Published
2002-03-19
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
161-173
ISSN
  • 0310-7841 (ISSN-L)
  • 1446-5655
OpenAlex
W2130675904
Cited by
338
References
3
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution and diversity of CO 2 concentrating mechanisms in cyanobacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/pp01213
The paper
Badger, M. R., Hanson, D., & Price, G. D. (2002). Evolution and diversity of CO 2 concentrating mechanisms in cyanobacteria. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp01213

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.