The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adaptation to Water Stress of the Leaf Water Relations of Four Tropical Forage Species
Abstract
Three tropical grasses, green panic (Panicum maximum var, trichoglume), spear grass (Heteropogon contortus) and buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) and the tropical legume siratro (Macroptilium atropurpureum), were grown in plots in a semi-arid field environment. The water relations characteristics of leaves from plants subjected to a soil drying cycle were compared with those of unstressed leaves from plants in irrigated plots. Minimum water potentials attained in the stressed leaves were c. -44, - 38, - 33 and - 13 bar for the four species, respectively. The grass leaves adjusted osmotically to water stress, apparently through accumulation of solutes, so that there was a decrease in osmotic potential at full turgor (Ψπ100) of 5.5, 3.9 and 7.1 bar, and in water potential at zero turgor (Ψ0) of 8.6, 6.5 and 8.6 bar for green panic, spear grass and buffel respectively. Water stress appeared to increase slightly the proportion of bound water (B) and the bulk modulus of elasticity (ε) of the grass leaves, but it did not alter the relative water content at zero turgor (RWC0) or the ratio of turgid water content to dry weight of the tissue. The Ψπ100 and Ψ0 of stressed siratro leaves decreased by 2.5-4 bar and 3-5 bar respectively when subjected to soil drying cycles. These changes could be explained by the marked decrease in the ratio of turgid water content to dry weight of the leaf tissue rather than by accumulation of solutes. The values of RWC0 and ε for siratro leaves were not altered by stress but, in contrast to the grasses, B was apparently decreased although the data exhibited high variability. Adjustments in Ψπ100 and Ψ0 of stressed leaves of buffel grass and siratro were largely lost within 10 days of rewatering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant.
Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., & Pereira, J. S. (2003) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp02076 · Cited by 3,845
Coping with drought: stress and adaptive responses in potato and perspectives for improvement
Obidiegwu, J. E. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00542 · Cited by 362
An overview on drought induced changes in plant growth, water relations and photosynthesis
Lidon, Z. (2012) · Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.9755/ejfa.v24i1.10599 · Cited by 357
Effect of Abiotic Stress on Crops
Yadav, S., Modi, P., Dave, A., Vijapura, A., Patel, D., & Patel, M. (2020) · Sustainable Crop Production · doi:10.5772/intechopen.88434 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, Jr., Ludlow, M., Fisher, M., & Schulze, E.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1980-04-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 207-220
- ISSN
- 0310-7841 (ISSN-L)
- 1446-5655
- OpenAlex
- W1986778712
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptation to Water Stress of the Leaf Water Relations of Four Tropical Forage Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/pp9800207
- The paper
- Wilson, Jr., Ludlow, M., Fisher, M., & Schulze, E. (1980). Adaptation to Water Stress of the Leaf Water Relations of Four Tropical Forage Species. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp9800207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.