The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination of the Average Partial Pressure of CO2 in Chloroplasts From Leaves of Several C3 Plants
Abstract
Measurements of CO2 and water vapour exchange by leaves were combined with measurements of carbon isotope composition (13C/12C) of CO2 in the air passing over the leaf. Carbon isotope discrimination during CO2 uptake was determined from the difference in carbon isotope composition of the air leaving the leaf chamber with or without a leaf enclosed. Leaves of wheat plants grown with different nitrogen nutrition and leaves of several other species were examined. The measurements, made at different irradiances for a given leaf, showed that carbon isotope discrimination was strongly correlated with the rate of CO2 assimilation as well as the ratio of intercellular to ambient partial pressure of CO2, pI/pa. A function relating carbon isotope discrimination to the rate of CO2 assimilation was used to estimate the CO2 transfer conductance, gw, from the substomatal cavities to the sites of carboxylation for individual leaves. The photosynthetic capacity correlated with the CO2 transfer conductance, gw, and the average ratio of chloroplastic to intercellular partial pressure of CO2, pI/pa, was 0.7. This means that in general under high irradiance, the ratio of chloroplastic to ambient partial pressure of CO2 is about 0.5. In wheat, variation in gw was correlated with the chloroplast surface area appressing intercellular airspaces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis
Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., & Hubick, K. T. (1989) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 · Cited by 7,063
Cited by
Lawlor, D. W., & Cornic, G. (2002) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00814.x · Cited by 1,994
Diffusive and Metabolic Limitations to Photosynthesis under Drought and Salinity in C 3 Plants
Flexas, J., Bota, J., Loreto, F., Cornic, G., & Sharkey, T. D. (2004) · Plant Biology · doi:10.1055/s-2004-820867 · Cited by 1,467
Physiological and structural tradeoffs underlying the leaf economics spectrum
Onoda, Y., Wright, I. J., Evans, J. R., Hikosaka, K., Kitajima, K., Niinemets, Ü., Poorter, H., Tosens, T., & Westoby, M. (2017) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14496 · Cited by 722
Self-citationETHIER, G. J., & LIVINGSTON, N. J. (2004) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01140.x · Cited by 587
Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of species that differ inherently in specific leaf area
Poorter, H., & Evans, J. R. (1998) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420050560 · Cited by 587
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Caemmerer, S., & Evans, Jr.
- Venue
- Functional Plant Biology
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 287
- ISSN
- 1445-4408 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138086920
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of the Average Partial Pressure of CO2 in Chloroplasts From Leaves of Several C3 Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/pp9910287
- The paper
- Caemmerer, S., & Evans, Jr. (1991). Determination of the Average Partial Pressure of CO2 in Chloroplasts From Leaves of Several C3 Plants. Functional Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp9910287
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.