Cited by 13Diabetes Management and EducationChronic Disease Management StrategiesHealth Education and Validation

Client perceptions of group education in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in South Australia

Smith, Cynthia, McNaughton, Darlene A., Meyer, Samantha·2016·Australian Journal of Primary Health

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a progressive chronic disease that requires significant self-surveillance and adherence to the treatment protocols for successful management and future health. There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that diabetes education is beneficial for patient outcomes. However, there is some debate about how best to deliver diabetes education, whether individually or in groups. Although several studies have investigated the role of group education in improving the management of T2DM, few studies have examined this issue from the client’s perspective. It is here that this study makes a contribution to understanding diabetes management. Drawing on systematic observation of group education sessions provided by diabetic resource nurses and in-depth interviews with clients, this paper describes the experiences, perspectives and significance of these sessions to clients. Our results suggest that group education sessions were seen as valuable to the clients for: the opportunity they provided to meet others living with diabetes; to improve motivation for managing the disease; and to enhance knowledge of diabetes, its management and long-term implications. In short, this study demonstrates that the clients value group education sessions for the social contact, increasing knowledge about the disease for self-management and support they provide; factors recognised as important to maintaining health. In addition, group education sessions appear to be a cost-effective method for diabetes self-management that funders need to consider.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/py15008

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Groups are beneficial as they provide opportunities to meet others with similar health issues, learn from peers, develop self-awareness, give and receive feedback, and recognize shared challenges that can lead to more success with self-management.

    “Groups are beneficial as they provide opportunities to meet others with similar health issues or in similar circumstances, learn from peers, develop self-awareness, give and receive feedback, and recognize that others share comparable challenges that can lead to more success with self-management [1].”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, C., McNaughton, D. A., & Meyer, S.
Affiliations
  • Camosun College (CA)
  • Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Smith, Cynthia
Venue
Australian Journal of Primary Health
Published
2015-09-09
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
360-367
ISSN
  • 1448-7527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1836-7399
OpenAlex
W2166651047
Cited by
13
References
38
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Journal of Primary Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, group education, diabetes self-management, consumer perception, social support, patient motivation, diabetes knowledge, cost-effectiveness, South Australia
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, South Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review