The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of oocyte quality: morphological, cellular and molecular predictors
Abstract
Mounting evidence that oocyte quality profoundly affects fertilisation and subsequent embryo development drives the continued search for reliable predictors of oocyte developmental competence. In the present review, we provide an overall summary and analysis of potential criteria that can be used to evaluate oocyte quality. These criteria are specifically classified as morphological and cellular/molecular predictors. Traditional methods for the evaluation of oocyte quality are based on morphological classification of the follicle, cumulus–oocyte complex, polar body and/or meiotic spindle. Although the use of morphological characteristics as predictors of oocyte quality is controversial, such a grading system can provide valuable information for the preselection of oocytes with higher developmental competence and, therefore, may maximise embryo developmental outcome. Several intrinsic markers (such as mitochondrial status and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase l activity) and extrinsic markers (such as apoptosis of follicular cells and levels of the transforming growth factor-ß superfamily in follicular fluid or serum) have also been reported as useful indicators of oocyte competence and embryo quality. Compared with the morphological parameters, these cellular and molecular predictors of oocyte quality may prove to be more precise and objective, although further studies and refinement of techniques are needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bcl-2 heterodimerizes in vivo with a conserved homolog, Bax, that accelerates programed cell death
Oltval, Z. N., Milliman, C. L., & Korsmeyer, S. J. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90509-o · Cited by 6,003
Prevention of Apoptosis by Bcl-2: Release of Cytochrome c from Mitochondria Blocked
Yang, J., Liu, X., Bhalla, K., Kim, C. N., Ibrado, A. M., Cai, J., Peng, T.-I., Jones, D. P., & Wang, X. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5303.1129 · Cited by 4,911
Role of oxidative stress in female reproduction
Agarwal, A., Gupta, S., & Sharma, R. K. (2005) · Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/1477-7827-3-28 · Cited by 1,729
Van Blerkom, J., Davis, P. W., & Lee, J. (1995) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135954 · Cited by 670
Battaglia, D. E., Goodwin, P., Klein, N. A., & Soules, M. R. (1996) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019080 · Cited by 645
Contribution of the oocyte to embryo quality
Sirard, M.-A., Richard, F., Blondin, P., & Robert, C. (2006) · Theriogenology · doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.020 · Cited by 593
Stojkovic, M., Machado, S. A., Stojkovic, P., Zakhartchenko, V., Hutzler, P., Gonçalves, P. B., & Wolf, E. (2001) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod64.3.904 · Cited by 530
McKenzie, L. J., Pangas, S. A., Carson, S. A., Kovanci, E., Cisneros, P., Buster, J. E., Amato, P., & Matzuk, M. M. (2004) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deh535 · Cited by 412
Mitochondrial content reflects oocyte variability and fertilization outcome
Santos, T. A., El Shourbagy, S., & St. John, J. C. (2006) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.017 · Cited by 392
Klein, N. A. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.81.7.2742 · Cited by 373
Cited by
Role of Coenzyme Q10 in Health and Disease: An Update on the Last 10 Years (2010–2020)
Cirilli, I., Damiani, E., Dludla, P. V., Hargreaves, I., Marcheggiani, F., Millichap, L. E., Orlando, P., Silvestri, S., & Tiano, L. (2021) · Antioxidants · doi:10.3390/antiox10081325 · Cited by 115
Ovarian and extra-ovarian mediators in the development of polycystic ovary syndrome
Puttabyatappa, M., & Padmanabhan, V. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/jme-18-0079 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Q., & Sun, Q.-Y.
- Venue
- Reproduction, Fertility and Development
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2006-12-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 1031-3613 (ISSN-L)
- 1448-5990
- OpenAlex
- W2045869961
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 6.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of oocyte quality: morphological, cellular and molecular predictors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1071/rd06103
- The paper
- Wang, Q., & Sun, Q.-Y. (2006). Evaluation of oocyte quality: morphological, cellular and molecular predictors. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. https://doi.org/10.1071/rd06103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.